Proceedings of Highly Specialized International Scientific Conferences as a Source of Bibliographic Citations for Reasonable Scientometric Analysis Performed de visu

Author:

Lazarev Vladimir1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Belarusian National Technical University, Minsk, Belarus

Abstract

In the context of restrictions to access to deservedly popular leading scientometric databases, the possibilities of reasonable use of the proceedings of highly specialized international scientific conferences as a source of bibliographic citations for scientometric analysis performed de visu are considered. Though there are not so many areas of science on which conferences are resulted with the publication of truly representative proceedings, the analysis of which makes it possible to assess the state of the scientific area as a whole, but they do exist; moreover, they do not necessarily have even at least one specialized scientific journal. We emphasize that really important scientific areas are meant: thus, in the nineties of the last century, when the author was engaged in such research, the important areas under his study that did not have specialized journals devoted entirely to them were magnetic fluids and bone marrow purification and processing.

Publisher

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. MacRobеrts, M. H. and MacRoberts, B. R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Vol. 40, no. 5. P. 342–349.

2. Kara-Murza, S. G. (1981). Citation in science and approaches to the assessment of scientific impact. Vestnik AN SSSR = Herald of the USSR AS. No. 5. P. 68–75. (In Russ.).

3. Voverene, O. I. (1973). Tsitirovanie v nauke i podkhody k otsenke nauchnogo vklada [On evaluation of the effectiveness of selective information dissemination systems]. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Ser. 1. Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoi raboty. No. 9. P. 12–14. (In Russ.).

4. Mirskaya, E. Z. (1976). Mekhanizm otsenki i formirovaniya znaniya v estestvennykh naukakh [The mechanism of assessment and formation of knowledge in the natural sciences]. Voprosy filosofii = Problems of philosophy. No. 5. P.119–130. (In Russ.).

5. Filosofskiy slovar logiki, psikhologii, etiki, estetiki i istorii filosofii [Philosophical Dictionary: Logic, Psychology, Ethics, Aesthetics and the History of Philosophies]. (1904). Ed. by E. L. Radlov. St.-Petersburg: Brokgauz – Efron. 284 р. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3