An Interpretation of Digitalization of Science: A Comparative Outline of the Main Analytical Approaches

Author:

Sokolov Dmitry1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Independent Researcher, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The article attempts to summarize the most significant approaches to understanding the digitalization of science. We proceed from the assumption that the development of theoretical models for assessing the “digital turn” will not only help to clarify the changes taking place in science, but will also allow us to better understand them, as well as possibly regulate various aspects of digitalization. We can say that by the 2010s at least four categories (or clusters) of approaches to the conceptualization of digitalization have developed, and each category often operates with its own definitions and a separate conceptual framework. This refers to scientometric, economic, information technology (IT) and sociological approaches to understanding the process of digitalization in science. Even a cursory comparison of their specific characteristics allows us to say that all the paradigms listed above have a number of common features and are based on several fundamental premises regarding the trends in the development of science and education, although an assessment of these trends, as well as an emphasis within each approach can differ significantly. We can single out three most large-scale complexes of phenomena that are in the focus of researchers in the field of digitalization of science: this is the formation of a global academic community thanks to digital services (1), the personalization of higher education (2) and the problem of digital inequality (3). The juxtaposition of these processes, thus, significantly changes several important features of science in general, forcing the academic community to raise questions about the definitions and essence of scientific knowledge once again.

Publisher

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)

Reference25 articles.

1. Solla Price de D. J. Little science, big science. In: The science of science [Nauka o nauke]. Moscow : Progress; 1966. P. 281–384. (In Russ.).

2. Bell D. The coming of post-industrial society: A venture of social forecasting. Transl. from English, ed. by V. L. Inozemtsov. Moscow : Academia; 1999. CLXX, 783, [3] p. (In Russ.). ISBN 5-87444-070-4.

3. Castells M. The information age: Economy, society and culture. Transl. from English, ed. by O. I. Shkaratan. Moscow : HSE Publishing House; 2000. 608 p. (In Russ.). ISBN 5-7598-0069-8.

4. Nalimov V. V., Mul’chenko Z. M. Scientometrics: Study of the development of science as an information process [Naukometriya: izuchenie razvitiya nauki kak informatsionnogo protsessa]. Moscow : Nauka; 1969. 192 p. (In Russ.).

5. Srnicek N. Platform capitalism. Transl. and ed. by M. Dobryakova. Moscow : HSE Publishing House; 2019. 128 p. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-7598-1786-4.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3