Cognitive Resistance to Government Influences in Russia (the Case of COVID-19 Vaccination)

Author:

Babich Nikolay1ORCID,Batykov Ivan1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Sociology of the FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The article considers the phenomenon of “cognitive resistance” as individuals’ blocking of certain behavior that is stimulated by means of communicative influence on them. This phenomenon can be observed in relation to influences that are perceived by addressees as manipulation. The article presents the results of an empirical study, the purpose of which was to test the hypothesis of the presence of such resistance. The method of a survey experiment of the “split ballot” type was used. During the public opinion poll one group was offered informational materials about vaccination against COVID-19, allegedly coming from government agencies, the other group – the same materials, but allegedly coming from a private person. Comparison of the results showed that the respondents of the first group experienced a significantly higher level of distrust of the source’s motives, more actively sought to find a refutation of the information they offered, and worsened their attitude to vaccination instead of improving it. Thus, the study confirms the existence of the phenomenon of cognitive resistance in Russian society on the example of the situation with vaccination against COVID-19, and shows that the reason for this cognitive resistance is probably the attribution of hostile motives to the state.

Publisher

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference14 articles.

1. Vakhtina M.A. (2011). Doverie k gosudarstvu kak faktor povyshenija ego jeffektivnosti. [Trust in the state as a factor of increasing its effectiveness]. Zhurnal institucional’nyh issledovanij. № 3. Р. 57–65. (In Russ.).

2. Gimpelson V. E., Monusova G. A. (2012). Doverie politsii: mezhstranovoj analiz. [The trust of the police: an inter-country analysis]. Voprosy ekonomiki. № 11. Р. 24–47. (In Russ.).

3. Zhuravlev A. L., Sumarokova V. A. (2012). Regional’nye i polovye razlichija doverija predprinimatelej k raznym vidam organizatsij [Regional and gender differences of entrepreneurs ‘ trust in different types of organizations]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. № 4. Р. 36–45. (In Russ.).

4. Kleiner G. B. (1999). Ekonomika Rossii i krizis vzaimnyh ozhidanij. [The economy of Russia and the crisis of mutual expectations]. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. № 2. Р. 5–19. (In Russ.).

5. Kozyreva P. M. (2008). Pravovoe soznanie i doverie. [Legal consciousness and trust]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija. № 4. Р. 86–101. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3