Affiliation:
1. Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russia
Abstract
The effectiveness of robot implementation in various societal sectors depends not only on the robot’s technical characteristics but also on how different social groups perceive and interact with them. Social attitudes towards robots, in turn, are influenced by sociocultural and sociodemographic factors. In the context of the sociology of technology and actor-network theory, this research explores the social significance of technical devices, the processes of social adaptation, and communication with robots. However, empirical research on human-robot interaction (HRI), especially in the Russian context, remains limited. This article presents the results of a study that examines the perceptions of robots by actual and potential users in two aspects: the level of basic social attitudes towards new technologies and robots (social acceptability) and the evaluation of interactions with robots in specific situations (practical acceptability). The empirical basis of the study consists of survey data from customers at a multifunctional center providing state and municipal services in Perm. They received services from either a service anthropomorphic robot, Promobot V.4, or a human employee at the center. Using cluster analysis, three types (clusters) of attitudes towards innovations and robots were identified at the level of basic social attitudes: robo-skeptics, robo-phobes, and robo-philes. The social characteristics of these identified types were examined. The study introduces an original method for measuring satisfaction with actual interactions with service robots based on various parameters (evaluation of service convenience, communication quality, personal activity, willingness to recommend robot services, etc.). The study confirms the hypothesis of the connection between the type of attitude towards innovations and robots and the satisfaction with actual interactions with robots in specific situations. The lowest levels of satisfaction with robot interactions and the desire to avoid such interactions were observed among robo-phobes, who are more frequently represented by individuals of senior age group (age 55 and above). The research results allow determining the prospects for implementing service robots in the public space of a major Russian city based on understanding the social attitudes of users.
Publisher
Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference15 articles.
1. Yadov V. A. Self-regulation and forecasting of a person’s social behavior: A dispositional concept [Samoregulyaciya i prognozirovanie social`nogo povedeniya lichnosti: Dispozicionnaya koncepciya]. Moscоw: CSPiM; 2013. 376 p. (In Russ.).
2. Chaminade T., Rosset D., Fonseca D. F., Nazarian B, et al. How do we think machines think? An fMRI study of alleged competition with an artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2012;(6). DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00103.
3. Busch B., Maeda G., Mollard Y., Demangeat M., Lopes M. Postural optimization for an ergonomic human-robot interaction. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Vancouver: BC, Canada; 2017. P. 2778–2785. Available at: https://hal.science/hal-01629426/document (accessed: 02.04.2023).
4. Krägeloh C. U., Bharatharaj J, Sasthan Kutty S. K., Nirmala P. R, Huang L. Questionnaires to measure acceptability of social robots: a critical review. Robotics. 2019;8(4):88. DOI 10.3390/robotics8040088.
5. Nam T. Citizen attitudes about job replacement by robotic automation. Futures. 2019; (109):39–49. DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2019.04.005.