The objective and subjective indicators comparative analysis for assessing social inequalities in regions

Author:

Merzlykov Andrey1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The article raises the problem of assessing the degree of sensitivity of the population in relation to the socio-economic situation in the regions, which lies in the fact that the population has its own idea of the state of affairs in the region, and these ideas are not always consistent with the official position of the regional decision-making authorities, as usually based on statistics. Such an assessment can be carried out through a comparative (comparative) analysis of objective (based on statistical data) and subjective (based on sociological data) indicators that characterize the state of social inequalities in the regions. The main results of a comparative analysis are presented on the example of assessing specific areas of life, such as the labor market, housing and the state of housing and communal services, the road transport system, healthcare, etc. fundamental research of the Center for the Sociology of Management and Social Technologies of the Federal Scientific Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, which highlighted the close relationship between the sociocultural and socioeconomic levels of development of regions. A comparative analysis of subjective and objective indicators for assessing the state of social inequalities showed their linear-nonlinear relationship, i.e. in some cases, the subjective (sociological) assessment can be comparable with the objective one, formed on the basis of statistical data, in other cases, such an assessment is very different from the statistical data. As a result, the initial hypothesis was corrected, noting that a certain interdependence of the depth and severity of social inequalities was found in the regions, but it is unstable and depends on the region and the specific field of activity.

Publisher

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference16 articles.

1. Tikhonov A. V., ed. Russia: reforming the power-management vertical in the context of sociocultural modernization of the regions. Moscow : FCTAS RAS; 2017. 432 p. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-89697-298-3.

2. Tikhonov A. V., Merzlyakov A. A., eds. Reforming the power and management vertical in the context of the implementation of national projects and the activation of spontaneous grouping processes. Moscow : FCTAS RAS; 2017. 455 p. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-89697-380-5.

3. Goffe N. V., Monusova G. A. Social well-being: perception of realities. SouthRussian Journal of Social Sciences=Yuzhnorossijskij zhurnal social’nyh nauk. 2018;19(3):21–36. (In Russ.).

4. Zborovsky G. E. Methodological approaches to the study of the social well-being of youth. Bulletin of Perm National Research Polytechnic University. Socioeconomic sciences=Vestnik Permskogo nacional’nogo issledovatel’skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Social’noekonomicheskie nauki. 2021;(4):8–19. (In Russ.). DOI 10.15593/2224-9354/2021.4.1.

5. Golenkova Z. T., Igitkhanyan E. D., Chernysh M. F., Semenova L. A. Social inequality and socio-structural changes. In: Russia in global processes: the search for prospects. Ed. M. K. Gorshkov. Moscow : Institut sociologii RAN; 2008. Р. 26–51. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-89697-152-8.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3