Russia’s Science Policy in 2018–2022: Controversial Signals

Author:

Dezhina Irina1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The article analyzes the Russian science policy that has been implemented during last five years, after setting new goals in 2018. Science policy measures are examined in the projection of three actors. The first actor is the government that sets goals, systems of management and coordination, and allocates the funds. The second actor is the Russian Academy of Sciences, which performs an expert function. The third actor is university science, which has become the main beneficiary of state support in recent years. The aim of the article is to identify the key directions of the country’s science policy in projections of the readiness of the science system to the radically changed geopolitical conditions that have emerged in 2022. During the last five years, the system of science management has evolved towards increased centralization of power. Such system allows concentrating resources on key tasks. However, such tasks that would need centralized effort were not set. The main objectives of the science policy focused on the diversification and integration of the Russian science into the international scientific community (through the improvement of positions in the international ratings, growth of publications indexed in international databases, encouraging academic mobility). The result of the contradicting government policy was unpreparedness of the science sector to sanctions. The state was able to undertake only actions of immediate reaction; the time was lost to develop measures aimed at existence in isolation from key world scientific powers.

Publisher

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference26 articles.

1. Ablazhei N.N., Vodichev E.G., Krasil’nikov S.A. University and the Academy of Sciences: Pas de Deux in the Rhythms of the Epoch. Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologii. 2021. No. 12 (1). P. 113–135. DOI: 10.24411/2079-0910-2021-11008 (In Russ.)

2. Balatsky E.V. Russia’s Damage from International Sanctions: Rethinking the Facts. Mir novoi ekonomiki. 2018. No. 12 (3). P. 36–45. DOI: 10.26794/2220–6469–2018–12–336–45 (In Russ.)

3. Vasilyeva I.N., Krisko M.O., Korneeva N.D., Rozova O.I. The Relevance of the Tools and Mechanisms Created During the Implementation of the Action Plan of the Strategy of Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation and the Impact of the Proposed Measures on the Socio-Economic Development of the Russian Federation. Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologii. 2022. No. 13 (3). P. 118–142. DOI: 10.24412/2079-0910-2022-3-118-142 (In Russ.)

4. Vlasova V., Gershman M. Making Science in Russia: Attitudes and Expectations. Nauka. Tekhnologii. Innovatsii. Ekspress-informatsiya. 14.12.2022. Accessed 12.04.2023. URL: https://issek.hse.ru/news/802297927.html (In Russ.)

5. Volchik V.V. Institutional Traps in the Education and Science Sector under the Conditions of Optimisation. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii. 2019. No. 16 4). P. 783–795. DOI: 10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-4.14 (In Russ.)

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3