Affiliation:
1. National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia
2. National Research Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia
Abstract
The article presents issues that reflect modern strategies and tactics for constructing a holistic image of a city. The so-called assembly (reassembly) is executed in response to the challenges of a scattered, fragmented, decentralized, hybrid city, but a developing city nonetheless. We reveal several types of “assembly”, depending on who the “outlook collectors” are: each time these are either those who generally approve of the policies of the powers that be, or opposition-minded bloggers, popular leaders of urban communities; or members of research groups. The authors consider the city as a dynamic system that forms many vectors of development and makes for diversity of urban discourse. The article proves that in the media three types of discourse compete in the city space: the discourse of sustainable development, critical urbanism, as well as a softer version referred to as the discourse of new urbanism. We conduct subject analysis of texts and statements made by members of social media communities (from three Siberian cities: Novosibirsk, Barnaul, Tomsk), who conduct spatial development audits and offer their own scenarios for putting together a city. The role and the importance are shown of virtual assemblies, which, if social media communities are anything to go by, can lead to creating actual assemblies and to the interaction of all city actors in the process of transforming space, to revising the modes of involvement of citizens in process of designing urban life. Discussions related to putting together a city may also slow down the process of implementing urban projects and hamper practices of further developing cities that are considered historical settlements. Moreover, citizens’ demands for an authentic urban space that can be called genuine and historic are often neglected by government officials. Each of the analyzed cities demonstrates its own unique set of institutional mechanisms and interactions of participants in decision-making arenas that are a product of a certain unique cultural, social, political and historical context.
Publisher
Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)
Reference37 articles.
1. Ben’yamin V. Moscow. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoi vosproizvodimosti: izbrannye esse. [A Work of Art in the Era of Its Technical Reproducibility: Selected Essays.] Ed. by Yu.A. Zdorovyi. Moscow: Medium publ., 1996. P. 163–209. (In Russ.)
2. Berking Kh. “You Recognize Cities as People by Their Gait”: Sketches about the Study of Cities and Towns. Sobstvennaya logika gorodov. Novye podkhody v urbanistike. [Own Logic of Cities. New Approaches in Urbanism.] Ed. by Kh. Berking, M. Lev. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie publ., 2008. P. 15–29. (In Russ.)
3. Bodrunova S.S., Smolyarova A.S., Blekanov I.S., Zhuravleva N.N., Danilova Yu.S. A Global Public Sphere of Compassion? #JeSuisCharlie and #JeNeSuisPasCharlie on Twitter and Their Language Boundaries. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny. 2018. No. 1. P. 267–295. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2018.1.14 (In Russ.)
4. Buchli V. An Anthropology of architecture. [Russ. ed.: Antropologiya arkhitektury. Transl. from Eng. by M.V. Grigor’eva, O.V. Gritchina. Kharkov: Gumanitarnyi tsentr publ., 2017. 288 p.]
5. Vakhshtain V.S. The Reassembly of the City: Between Language and Space. Sotsiologiya vlasti. 2014. No. 2. P. 9–38. (In Russ.)