Affiliation:
1. Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia
Abstract
The importance of human capital and human development for understanding economics and social relations has repeatedly been proven since the time of Adam Smith. Theories on human capital and human development were conceptualized in their modern form in the USA in the 1960’s to 1980’s. However, in recent decades they have been seriously criticized in scientific literature, primarily due to issues pertaining to how they approach measurement. In this article a critical revision of the main approaches towards evaluating human capital in modern social sciences is conducted. New strategies for measuring human capital and human development include not only a “quantitative” indicator (number of years spent receiving formal education), but also an indicator showing the quality of acquired knowledge and skills. Such approaches provide a possibility to observe the improvement or degradation of human capital outside of conventional formal education, which allows perceiving human capital as embedded in the processes of local social, economic and historical development. This historical rootedness of human capital and human development seems to be of utmost importance for fluid societies in a state of crisis. The prospects for sociologization of the concepts of human capital and human development as well as the potential of life-course sociology for their analysis are discussed. It is suggested to view human capital through a cohort approach lens. The discussion outlines research strategies for studying human capital and human development within the proposed logic.
Publisher
Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)
Reference60 articles.
1. Bondarenko N.V., Varlamova T.A., Gohberg L.M., et al. Indikatory obrazovaniya: 2023: Statisticheskii sbornik. [Education indicators: 2023: Statistical collection.] Moscow: NIU VHsE publ., 2023. (In Russ.)
2. Bulina A.O., Mozgovaya K.A., Pakhnin M.A. Human capital in the theory of economic growth: classical models and new approaches. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ekonomika. [Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Economy.] 2020. Vol. 36. No. 2. P. 163–188. DOI: 10.21638/spbu05.2020.201 (In Russ.)
3. Gorshkov M.K., Sheregi F.E., Tyurina I.O. Vosproizvodstvo specialistov intellektual’nogo truda: sotsiologicheskii analiz. [Reproduction of intellectual labor specialists: sociological analysis.] Moscow: FNISTs RAN publ., 2023. DOI: 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-413-0.2023 (In Russ.)
4. Gohberg L.M., Ozerova O.K., Sautina E.V. Obrazovanie v tsifrakh: 2021: kratkii statisticheskii sbornik. [Education in numbers: 2021: brief statistical collection.] Moscow: NIU VHsE publ., 2021. (In Russ.)
5. Parsons T. O strukture sotsial’nogo deistviya. [On the structure of social action.] Ed. by V.F. Chesnokova, S.A. Belanovskiy. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt publ., 2018. 435 p. (In Russ.)