Athletic Trainers’ Perceptions of and Experiences With Unlearning in Clinical and Educational Practice

Author:

Pike Lacy Alicia M.1,Cavallario Julie M.2,Lam Kenneth C.3,Welch Bacon Cailee E.45

Affiliation:

1. *School of Kinesiology, Physical Education and Athletic Training, University of Maine, Orono

2. †School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA

3. ‡Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences

4. §Department of Athletic Training

5. ‖School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ

Abstract

Context Unlearning is a critical component of evidence-based practice, yet research related to its role in athletic training practice is limited. Objective To explore athletic trainers’ (ATs’) perceptions of and experiences with unlearning. Design Cross-sectional. Setting Online survey with open-ended questions. Patients or Other Participants Seven hundred fifteen of 6925 ATs accessed the survey (access rate = 10.3%) with 640 ATs completing it (completion rate = 94%). Main Outcome Measure(s) We distributed a survey consisting of 8 to 10 demographic questions, 1 Likert-scale item on familiarity with unlearning, and 4 to 5 open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics summarize demographic information. Open-ended data were analyzed using the consensual qualitative research approach. Respondents who self-reported familiarity with unlearning were asked to described its meaning. To ensure data quality, these responses were compared with definitions of unlearning by 2 research team members. If consensus was reached that a participant’s understanding of unlearning aligned with the definitions, the remaining responses from that participant were included in the qualitative data analyses reported in this manuscript. Results Most respondents were minimally or not at all familiar with unlearning (n = 505/652, 77%). Approximately 46% (n = 181/391; 120 clinicians, 61 educators) accurately described the meaning of unlearning. Analysis of open-ended responses yielded 2 themes: barriers to unlearning and facilitators of unlearning. Reported barriers were intrinsic and extrinsic in nature and involved key stakeholders that frequently interact with ATs. Facilitators of unlearning included continued education, mentorship and team mindset, resources and evidence, and stakeholder education. Conclusions Respondents were largely unfamiliar with unlearning despite its role in promoting evidence-based practice. Continued education for ATs and relevant stakeholders is needed and may be accomplished through the creation and dissemination of accessible resources that highlight knowledge and skills that should be unlearned. These educational efforts may help to normalize unlearning in athletic training practice to continually improve the delivery of patient care.

Publisher

Journal of Athletic Training/NATA

Subject

General Chemical Engineering

Reference27 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3