Athletic Trainers’ Experiences Developing and Maintaining Contemporary Expertise

Author:

Strout Kemper Nicole R.1,Cavallario Julie M.2,Walker Stacy E.3,Welch Bacon Cailee E.14

Affiliation:

1. * Department of Athletic Training and

2. † Athletic Training Programs, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA

3. ‡ School of Kinesiology, Ball State University, Muncie, IN

4. § School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, A.T. Still University, Mesa

Abstract

Context The Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education (CAATE) implemented new accreditation standards for professional education in 2020, requiring educators and preceptors affiliated with CAATE-accredited professional programs to identify an area of contemporary expertise. Although this requirement is imperative to ensure that educators and preceptors are exposing students to the breadth and depth of content areas in athletic training practice, little is known about how an area of contemporary expertise is developed and maintained. Objective To explore educators’ and preceptors’ experiences with developing and maintaining an area of contemporary expertise. Design Cross-sectional. Setting Web-based survey. Participants Of 449 athletic trainers (ATs), 347 (183 educators and 164 preceptors) indicated an identified area of contemporary expertise, completed the survey, and were included in the data analysis. Data Collection and Analysis A 16-item survey (10 demographic items, 1 Likert-scale item, and 5 open-ended questions) was used. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize participant demographics and familiarity with contemporary expertise. Data analysis of open-ended responses was guided by a 4-phase, consensual qualitative research process using a 3-person team. An external auditor confirmed data representation and accuracy. Results Familiarity with contemporary expertise and its impact on practice was shared, and participants identified various activities and resources accessible for ATs. However, challenges associated with developing and maintaining expertise and conflicts with current certification expectations were also identified. Conclusions Program administrators and employers should consider how they can best support the endeavors of educators and preceptors for developing and maintaining areas of contemporary expertise. Program administrators should evaluate programmatic approaches to assist preceptors with maintaining contemporary expertise. Additionally, as educators and preceptors become more familiar with contemporary expertise, the Board of Certification and the CAATE should provide guidance regarding the intent of continuing education, how it relates to contemporary expertise, and how stakeholders can achieve the objectives set forth by regulatory groups.

Publisher

Journal of Athletic Training/NATA

Subject

General Chemical Engineering

Reference29 articles.

1. Motivators, anticipated challenges, and supportive factors for athletic trainers pursuing the doctor of athletic training degree;Mulder;Athl Train Educ J,2018

2. Trends in doctoral education among healthcare professions: an integrative research review;Seegmiller;Athl Train Educ J,2015

3. A framework for the future: communicating and enhancing the future of athletic training education;Sauers;NATA News

4. Contemporary expertise,2019

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3