Awareness and the Usage of Clinical Teaching Models in Clinical Education

Author:

Graham Jason1,Heinerichs Scott2,Barnum Mary3,Monaco Michele4,Martin Malissa1,Singe Stephanie M.5

Affiliation:

1. *Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions, Provo, UT

2. †College of Health Sciences, West Chester University, PA

3. ‡Department of Exercise Science and Athletic Training, Springfield College, MA

4. §Department of Health, Nutrition and Exercise Sciences, Immaculata University, PA

5. ||Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs

Abstract

Context Students spend over half of their professional preparation in clinical education under the instruction and supervision of preceptors. Preceptors must optimize the time spent creating high-quality, authentic clinical experiences. Preceptors serve as clinical educators and should be proficient in clinical teaching and using clinical teaching models. Objective Investigate if preceptors are aware of clinical teaching models and how often components of clinical teaching models are being used. Design Concurrent mixed methods. Setting Web-based survey and virtual semistructured interviews. Patients or Other Participants A total of 165 preceptors, averaging 10 ± 9 years of experience as a preceptor, completed the survey. We recruited 10 preceptors (4 male, 6 female, average of 12 ± 10 years of preceptorship experience) to volunteer in follow-up interviews. Data Collection and Analysis Surveys were administered via Qualtrics, and virtual interviews were completed using Zoom. Frequency tables were used to examine the quantitative survey data. A phenomenological approach of inquiry was used for interview data analysis. Member checking, external peer review, and triangulation were all used to establish trustworthiness. Results The Supervision, Questioning, Feedback (SQF) model was most recognized or used by preceptors (48% responded yes), unlike the One-Minute Preceptor (OMP) or the Summarize, Narrow, Analyze, Probe, Plan, and Select (SNAPPS) models (15%, 8% responded yes, respectively). Eight components aligned with the SQF model were frequently used daily or weekly. Components of the OMP or SNAPPS models were used less frequently. Preceptors describe using similar techniques to the SQF model but are generally unaware of clinical teaching models. Preceptors report eagerness in improving their clinical teaching abilities to enhance student clinical experiences. Conclusions Preceptors are largely unaware that clinical teaching models exist and need to be further instructed on how to incorporate them into clinical teaching. Preceptors have little experience in teaching practices, so enhancing their clinical teaching practices will improve students' professional growth and competence.

Publisher

Journal of Athletic Training/NATA

Subject

General Chemical Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3