Implementation of Educational Opportunities for Social Determinants of Health in Health Professions Education: A Scoping Review

Author:

Picha Kelsey J.1,Jones Bailey2,Garcia CJ1,Winkelmann Zachary K.3

Affiliation:

1. * Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences and

2. † Research Support, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ

3. ‡ Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia

Abstract

Objective Health professions programs have recently increased their efforts to educate health care professionals about the social determinants of health (SDH); however, there seems to be a disconnect between graduate medical education and its applicability to other peer health professions. The current scoping review aims to map the literature that explores the implementation of educational opportunities focused on SDH in health professions education programs. Data Sources PubMed, CINAHL, ERIC, Education Source, and the Health Policy Reference Center were searched to identify relevant articles. Study Selection To be included in our review, articles had to have been published in the last 5 years and describe how material related to SDH was implemented into a graduate health professions education program. Outcomes were analyzed by thematic categories by type of curricular delivery (didactic, clinical education, service-learning experience, or reflection), timing of the implementation in the program, methods of implementation, and assessment after implementation. Data Extraction Our search identified 2006 articles that were reviewed by study authors; 36 were included in our full-text review. Information extracted included the study design, type of graduate education, aims of the studies, description of technique, timing of implementation, type of curricular delivery, and outcomes. Data Synthesis The majority (23, 63.9%) of studies used an observational design and used 2 or more (27, 75.0%) types of curricular delivery presented to medical students. Didactic (19, 52.8%) and small-group discussion (14, 38.9%) methods were used most often. Assessments were mostly student reflections or self-report items. Overall, students reported increased knowledge and satisfaction with activities. Conclusions Results of our scoping review indicated that various education opportunities related to SDH exist in graduate health professions education but are likely insufficient. More studies are necessary to investigate the purposeful implementation of SDH and the best methods to assess student knowledge of SDH. Future research should also investigate how to objectively assess student learning of SDH.

Publisher

Journal of Athletic Training/NATA

Reference59 articles.

1. Wilkinson R, Marmot M , eds. Social Determinants of Health: The Solid Facts. 2nd ed. World Health Organization; 2003. Accessed November 22, 2023. https://intranet.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/98438/e81384.pdf

2. Social determinants of health at CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated December 8, 2022. Accessed November 22, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/about/sdoh/index.html

3. Health equity must be a strategic priority;Mate;NEJM Catalyst

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3