Clinical Practice Patterns of Interprofessional Collaboration: Considerations for Athletic Training Education

Author:

Hankemeier Dorice A.1,Manspeaker Sarah A.2,Feld Sharon D.3,Kirby Jessica L.4

Affiliation:

1. *School of Kinesiology, Ball State University, Muncie, IN

2. †Rangos School of Health Sciences, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA

3. ‡Molecular, Life, and Health Sciences, Loras College, Dubuque, IA

4. §Western Carolina University, Sylva, NC

Abstract

Context As required elements of accreditation, interprofessional education (IPE), and interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) are key considerations for athletic training educators, students, and practicing professionals. Objective Despite the emphasis on IPE and IPCP, little information exists regarding which health care professionals athletic trainers should collaborate with outside of physicians. In addition, no study has established which professionals athletic training students should be educated alongside in preparation for future interprofessional collaboration. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting Clinical practice settings. Patients or Other Participants Stratified sample of 105 athletic trainers across various employment settings. Data Collection and Analysis Participants selected the top 5 health care professionals with whom they currently interact, desire to collaborate, and believe students should be learning to interact with during clinical practice. Participants indicated how much time they spent in collaborative practice and the frequency and method of their interactions. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics including means, standard deviations, and frequency counts. Results In addition to physicians, participants identified physical therapists, physician assistants, nurses, and nurse practitioners as the primary professionals with whom they interacted in the past 12 months. Participants identified a desire to collaborate with sport and exercise psychologists, physical therapists, nutritionists, physician assistants, and certified or licensed professional counselors. In addition, participants indicated that athletic training students should learn with physical therapists, paramedics or emergency medical technicians (EMTs), physician assistants, nutritionists, and sport and exercise psychologists in preparation for future clinical practice. Regarding time, the majority (64.7%) of participants interact with other health care professionals multiple times a day or week. Conclusions These results are indicative of the need to prepare athletic training students to engage in collaboration with professionals beyond the naturally occurring partnerships with physicians. Educators could use these findings in the development or modification of IPE experiences, and the results may be considered in the development of continuing education opportunities to enhance practicing athletic trainers’ collaborations.

Publisher

Journal of Athletic Training/NATA

Subject

General Chemical Engineering

Reference40 articles.

1. Interprofessional education and practice in athletic training;Breitbach;Athl Train Educ J,2015

2. Sustainable implementation of interprofessional education using an adoption model framework;Grymonpre;Canadian J High Educ,2016

3. Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education (CAATE). 2020 Standards for Accreditation of Professional Athletic Training Programs . CAATE; 2019. Accessed August 4, 2023. https://caate.net/Portals/0/Standards_and_Procedures_Professional_Programs.pdf?ver=45lhjjb4hBwN3vKguwEQMw%3d%3d

4. Council for Clinical Certification in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). 2020 Standards for the Certificate of Clinical Competence in Speech-Language Pathology . ASHA; 2020. Accessed August 7, 2023. https://www.asha.org/certification/2020-slp-certification-standards/

5. Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education (CAPTE). Standards and Required Elements for Accreditation of Physical Therapist Education Programs . CAPTE; 2015. Accessed August 7, 2023. https://www.capteonline.org/globalassets/capte-docs/capte-pt-standards-required-elements.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3