Program Administrators' Perceived Challenges Associated With Developing Preceptors

Author:

Huett Jessica L.1,Cavallario Julie2,Hankemeier Dorice A.3,Welch Bacon Cailee E.4,Walker Stacy E.3

Affiliation:

1. *College of Pharmacy, Natural and Health Sciences, Manchester University, Fort Wayne, IN

2. †School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA

3. ‡School of Kinesiology, Ball State University, Muncie, IN

4. §Athletic Training Programs & School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, A.T. Still University, Mesa

Abstract

Context Understanding potential barriers that prevent program administrators from providing high-quality preceptor development opportunities will help inform strategies of preceptor development. Objective To explore the challenges program administrators encounter when developing preceptors for graduate, professional athletic training programs. Design Consensual qualitative research. Setting Individual semistructured phone interviews. Patients or Other Participants Eighteen program administrators (17 coordinators of clinical education, 1 program director; 5.92 ± 4.19 years of experience) participated in this study. Data saturation guided the number of participants. Data Collection and Analysis Semistructured interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A 4-person research team used a consensus process to analyze data and identify emergent themes. A consensual codebook was created after researchers independently coded the data and discussed emergent themes. Credibility of the findings was established through multiple researchers, an external auditor, and member checks. Results Two themes emerged, delivery and content. How to deliver development posed a challenge, with work schedules and geographical spread inhibiting the ability to schedule one in-person group meeting. Lastly, participants struggled to balance their own workloads to overcome the challenges of curating and delivering multiple preceptor development opportunities in addition to their existing academic obligations. Identifying which content to include that was relevant and useful to a variety of preceptors regardless of setting or experience was also a challenge for our participants. Participants felt that some preceptors were reticent to learn about program policies, accreditation requirements, or newly included clinical skills, making large-group development opportunities more challenging. Conclusions Administrators may need multiple preceptor development options to accommodate the varying levels of experience, desired content, and geographical locations of preceptors; however, this subsequently increases workload challenges. Educating institutional administrators about the demands of developing preceptors may open dialogue regarding workload and provision of necessary resources associated with preceptor development.

Publisher

Journal of Athletic Training/NATA

Subject

General Chemical Engineering

Reference34 articles.

1. Athletic Training Strategic Alliance. Strategic alliance degree statement. May 20, 2015. Accessed October 5, 2022. https://www.atstrategicalliance.org/strategic-alliance-degree-statement

2. Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education (CAATE). Implementation and guide to the 2020 professional standards. 2020. Accessed October 5, 2022. https://caate.net/Portals/0/Documents/Standards%20and%20Procedures%20for%20Accreditation%20of%20Professional%20Programs%20Updated%209.6.2022.pdf?ver=IHxl9QQJspd34BDTRbF_mQ%3d%3d

3. Nottingham S, Barrett JL, Mazerolle SM, Eason CM. Examining the role mentorship plays in the development of athletic training preceptors. Athl Train Educ J. 2016;11(3):127–137.

4. Hankemeier DA, Kirby JL, Walker SE, Thrasher AB. Athletic training preceptors' perceived learning needs regarding preceptor development. Athl Train Educ J. 2017;12(1):39–45.

5. Vos SS, Trewet CB. A comprehensive approach to preceptor development. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(3):1–7.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3