Sensory Reweighting System Differences on Vestibular Feedback with Increased Task Constraints in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability Compared to Healthy Controls

Abstract

Context Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is associated with a less flexibly adaptable sensorimotor system. Thus, individuals with CAI may present an inadequate sensory reweighting system inhibiting the ability to emphasize weight on reliable sensory feedback to control posture. However, how individuals with CAI reweight sensory feedback to maintain postural control in bilateral and unilateral stances has yet to be established. Objectives The primary purpose was to examine group differences in how the sensory reweighting system changes to control posture in a simple double-limb stance and a more complex single-limb stance (uninjured-limb, injured-limb) under increased environmental constraints manipulating somatosensory and visual information for individuals with and without CAI. The secondary purpose was to examine the effect of environmental and task constraints on postural control. Study Design Case-control study Setting Laboratory Patients or Other Participants 21 individuals with CAI (26.4±5.7years, 171.2±9.8cm, 76.6±15.17kg) and 21 healthy controls (25.8±5.7years, 169.5±9.5cm, 72.4±15.0kg) participated in the study. Main Outcome Measure(s) Equilibrium10 were examined while completing 6 environmental conditions of the Sensory Organization Test (SOT) during 3 tasks (double-limb and single-limb [uninjured, injured] stances). Sensory reweighting ratios for sensory systems (somatosensory, vision, vestibular) were computed from paired Equilibrium10. Results Significant 3-factor interactions were found between group, sensory systems, and tasks (P=0.006) and for groups, task, and environment (P=0.007). The CAI group failed to downweight vestibular feedback compared to healthy controls while maintaining posture in the injured-limb (P=0.030). The CAI group displayed better postural stability than healthy controls while standing with absent vision, fixed surroundings, and a moving platform in the injured-limb (P=0.032). Conclusions The CAI group relied on vestibular feedback while maintaining better postural stability than healthy controls in the injured-limb. Group differences in postural control depended on both environmental (absent vision, moving platform) and task (injured-limb) constraints.