Affiliation:
1. * Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia
2. † School of Health Sciences, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY
3. ‡ Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
4. § Athletic Training, West Virginia University, Morgantown
Abstract
Context
Best practices to manage cervical spine injury (CSI) in sport have been published, yet knowledge of their use is unknown.
Objective
To explore adoption of CSI management policies by high school (HS) athletic trainers (ATs) and their associated behaviors, barriers, and facilitators.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Setting
Online survey platform.
Patients or Other Participants
Athletic trainers providing medical services to US HSs.
Main Outcome Measure(s)
The precaution adoption process model was used in an online questionnaire to determine the stage of adoption by ATs for each CSI management policy component. Components obtained from the National Athletic Trainers’ Association position statement on acute management of an athlete with a CSI included immediate care, emergency tools to remove equipment, and maintenance of equipment-removal skills. Questions assessed AT demographics, HS characteristics, and facilitators and barriers to policy adoption. Data are presented as proportions and associations determined through χ2 analysis (P < .05).
Results
A total of 508 ATs’ responses were included. Of these ATs, 33.1% reported adoption of incomplete policies (<3 components of a CSI management policy, n = 168; 95% CI = 29.0%, 37.1%), and 66.9% reported adoption of comprehensive policies (n = 339; 95% CI = 62.9%, 71.0%). A significant association was found between coordination of CSI policies with emergency medical services (EMS) and adoption of the policy components for comprehensive immediate CSI care (χ21 = 49.56, P < .001), emergency tools for athletic equipment removal (χ21 = 41.49, P < .001), and the practice and maintenance of equipment-removal skills (χ21 = 86.12, P < .001). Approximately two-thirds (66.5%) reported that a positive relationship with EMS (n = 338; 95% CI = 62.4%, 70.7%) was a facilitator, whereas 42.5% reported challenges with local EMS as a barrier (n = 216; 95% CI = 38.2%, 46.9%).
Conclusions
Immediate care and emergency tool policy components had the highest rates of adoption. Higher rates of adoption in this project were associated with coordination of CSI policies with local EMS. Athletic trainers also reported challenges in coordinating with EMS. Interventions to improve collaboration, training, and interprofessional respect between ATs and EMS personnel may improve policy adoption.
Publisher
Journal of Athletic Training/NATA
Subject
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine