Affiliation:
1. KAHRAMANMARAS SUTCU IMAM UNIVERSTY
2. SELCUK UNIVERSITY
3. KAHRAMANMARAS SUTCU IMAM UNIVERSITY
Abstract
Objective: To demonstrate the changes in specular microscopy between uveitic eyes and healthy eyes.
Material and Methods: A retrospective study included 66 patients followed in the Uvea clinic of Selcuk University between 2015-2018. The right eyes of all patients were evaluated. The right eye data of 37 healthy individuals were used as the control group. The patients were divided into subgroups anterior, intermediate, and posterior uveitis. Specular microscopy measurements were made with Confo Scan 4. Comparisons were made between the groups in terms of endothelial cell density (ECD), pleomorphism (%), polymegatism (%), central corneal thickness (CCT), and intraocular pressure (IOP). A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: The mean age was 33.71±15.29 in the uveitis and 37.78±13.17 in the control group (p=0.432). There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of ECD, pleomorphism and polymegatism (all groups; p<0.01). No significant difference was found in terms of CCT and IOP (respectively; p=0.812, p=0.381). In the subgroup analysis, a significant difference was found between anterior, intermediate and posterior uveitis groups in terms of ECD (respectively; p=0.020, p=0.018). However, no significant difference in other groups (p=0.999). In comparison with healthy eyes of patients with monocular uveitis were significant differences in all parameters (all groups; p<0.01).
Conclusion: It is seen that ECD decreases, pleomorphism and polymegatism increase in patients with uveitis. This result showed the importance of preventing sequelae with early treatment in patients with uveitis. Speccular or confocal microscopy scanning is important in uveitic patients scheduled for intraocular surgery.
Publisher
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Dergisi
Subject
Computer Networks and Communications,Hardware and Architecture,Software
Reference22 articles.
1. Dick AD: Immune mechanisms of uveitis: insights into disease pathogenesis and treatment. Inter Ophthal Clin. 2000;40(2):1-18.
2. Jabs DA, Nussenblatt RB, Rosenbaum JT, Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Working Group: Amer J of Ophthalmol. 2005;140(3):509-16.
3. Tsirouki T, Dastiridou A, Symeonidis C, Tounakaki O, Brazitikou I, Kalogeropoulos C, et al. A focus on the epidemiology of uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2018;26:2-16.
4. Thorne JE, Suhler E, Skup M, Tari S, Macaulay D, Chao J, et al. Prevalence of noninfectious uveitis in the United States: a claims-based analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(11):1237-45.
5. Quiroga L, Lansingh VC, Samudio M, Peña FY, Carter MJ. Characteristics of the corneal endothelium and pseudoexfoliation syndrome in patients with senile cataract. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;38(5):449-55.