Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Perioperative Mechanical Ventilation Strategy: National Turkey Study

Author:

Orak Yavuz1ORCID,Çalışır Feyza2ORCID,Öksüz Hafize2ORCID,Kudsioglu Türkan3ORCID,Boran Ömer Faruk2ORCID,Solmaz İlker4ORCID,Doğaner Adem5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation. Faculty of Medicine. Kahramanmaraş Sutcu Imam University

2. Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation. Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sutcu Imam University

3. Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation. Dr. Siyami Ersek Chest and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital

4. Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation. Health Sciences University Gulhane Training and Research Hospital

5. Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to describe anesthesiologists' perioperative mechanical ventilation strategies in cases where cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is performed in Turkey. Material and Methods: Survey questions were sent twice via e-mail to members of the two associations consisting of specialists in Anesthesiology and Reanimation. The questions were divided into three parts to determine anesthesia applications and mechanical ventilation strategies in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods of CPB. Results: The questionnaire was provided with the participation of 269 anesthesiologists. 105 (40.2%) participants stated that the number of intensive care unit beds in their hospital was over 20. A 6 ml/kg (42.5%) coefficient is preferred in calculating tidal volume outside the CPB process. The number of participants who preferred low (0-5 cmH2O) positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) throughout the surgery was 41.1%. 40.8% of the participants prefer 5-10 cmH2O PEEP in “hemodynamically stable and obese patients”. During the CPB process, 38.3% of the participants turned off the mechanical ventilator, and 24.4 % preferred to wean the patient from the mechanical ventilator. While 35.8 % of anesthesia specialists preferred recruitment maneuvers, 38.9% did not. It was concluded that 51% of the participants preferred non-invasive ventilation in patients with hypoxemia/hypercapnia, and 55.1% applied pulmonary rehabilitation after extubation to all patients. Conclusion: Our study showed that the mechanical ventilation strategies followed by most anesthesiologists in CPB in Turkey are similar.

Publisher

Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Dergisi

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3