Genetic comparison of Brucella spp. and Ochrobactrum spp. erroneously included into the genus Brucella confirms separate genera
-
Published:2023-03
Issue:1
Volume:3
Page:31-37
-
ISSN:2703-1322
-
Container-title:German Journal of Veterinary Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Ger. J. Vet. Res.
Author:
Holzer Katharina,Hoelzle Ludwig E.,Wareth Gamal
Abstract
The facultative intracellular pathogen Brucella and the free-living bacteria Ochrobactrum are both α-proteobacteria and very close to each other. A group of researchers recently clustered Ochrobactrum strains into the genus Brucella according to a BLAST distance approach. Thus, we performed a deeper comparative genetic analysis for eleven Ochrobactrum strains and twelve different Brucella isolates to demonstrate important differences between these bacteria. In addition to the clear differences between Brucella and Ochrobactrum, like the differences in genes contents, and different genome sizes, the Brucella-specific gene bscp31 was not found in Ochrobactrum, as well as other important Brucella-specific proteins and virulence factors. Differences in antimicrobial resistance genes content and the presence or absence of plasmids were obvious between Brucella and Ochrobactrum spp. Genome alignment of Brucella spp. and Ochrobactrum spp. revealed a genome similarity of 85.7% maximum, whereas all analyzed Brucella spp. in this study had a similarity of 97.6-99.9%, and all compared Ochrobactrum spp. 82.6-98.0%. Because of these facts mentioned in this work, Brucella and Ochrobactrum should be considered separate genera.
Publisher
German Multidisciplinary Publishing Center
Subject
Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference43 articles.
1. Al Dahouk, S., Flèche, P.L., Nöckler, K., Jacques, I., Grayon, M., Scholz, H.C., Tomaso, H., Vergnaud, G., Neubauer, H., 2007. Evaluation of Brucella MLVA typing for human brucellosis. J. Microbiol. Methods 69, 137–145. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2006.12.015 2. Andrä, J., Goldmann, T., Ernst, C.M., Peschel, A., Gutsmann, T., 2011. Multiple peptide resistance factor (MprF)-mediated Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus against antimicrobial peptides coincides with a modulated peptide interaction with artificial membranes comprising lysyl-phosphatidylglycerol. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 18692–18700. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.226886 3. Baily, G.G., Krahn, J.B., Drasar, B.S., Stoker, N.G., 1992. Detection of Brucella melitensis and Brucella abortus by DNA amplification. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 95, 271–275. 4. Bao, Y., Sakinc, T., Laverde, D., Wobser, D., Benachour, A., Theilacker, C., Hartke, A., Huebner, J., 2012. Role of mprF1 and mprF2 in the pathogenicity of Enterococcus faecalis. PLoS ONE 7, e38458. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038458 5. Barquero-Calvo, E., Conde-Alvarez, R., Chacón-Díaz, C., Quesada-Lobo, L., Martirosyan, A., Guzmán-Verri, C., Iriarte, M., Mancek-Keber, M., Jerala, R., Gorvel, J.P., Moriyón, I., Moreno, E., Chaves-Olarte, E., 2009. The differential interaction of Brucella and ochrobactrum with innate immunity reveals traits related to the evolution of stealthy pathogens. PLoS ONE 4, e5893. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005893
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|