Affiliation:
1. Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology
2. Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; People’s Friendship University of Russia
Abstract
Background. A wide variety of pulse sequences, the possibility of multiplanar imaging significantly increase the capabilities of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing diseases of the female reproductive system. At the same time, the lack of a regulated scanning protocol, especially in patients who have undergone anticancer treatment, requires standardization of the technique and the search for an optimal set of pulse sequences that allows to visualize the vagina throughout its entire length and to perform differential diagnosis between continued tumor growth and post-radiation changes while maintaining an adequate examination time.Objective: to determine the optimal set of MRI pulse sequences for pelvic organs examination in patients with vaginal tumors and to form an original research protocol based on diagnostic information content.Material and methods. The study included 141 patients with vaginal tumors. A comparative analysis of four MRI protocols was carried out, built according to the principle “from simple to complex” (from native to multiparametric MRI).Results. A significant difference was obtained between all information content indicators of Protocol 4 compared to Protocol 1 (sensitivity p = 0.00006, specificity p = 0.00443, AUC p = 0.00000). Data analysis also showed a significant difference between sensitivity and AUC for Protocols 2 and 4 (p = 0.00150 and p = 0.00087, respectively), and Protocols 3 and 4 (p = 0.01333 and p = 0.01333, respectively).Conclusion. Significant increase in the information content of Protocol 4 compared to other protocols (sensitivity up to 93%, specificity up to 94%, accuracy up to 93%) indicates the expediency of the priority use of multiparametric MRI in the primary diagnosis of vaginal tumor lesions.
Reference23 articles.
1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019; 69(1): 7–34. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21551.
2. López C, Balogun M, Ganesan R, Olliff JF. MRI of vaginal conditions. Clin Radiol. 2005; 60(6): 648–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2005.02.010.
3. Filatova EI. Primary cancer of the vagina. Diagnosis and treatment tactics. Practical Oncology. 2006; 7(4): 228–35 (in Russ).
4. Nudnov NV, Aksenova SP, Kreynina YuM, Kotlyarov PM. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of secondary vaginal tumor involvement. Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2015; 3: 37–46 (in Russ).
5. Chow L, Tsui BQ, Bahrami S, et al. Gynecologic tumor board: a radiologist’s guide to vulvar and vaginal malignancies. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021; 46(12): 5669–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03209-2.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献