Fundamentals of an African-Centred Syllabus in Higher Education in the Post-Colonial Era: The Tehuti Perspective

Author:

Mthembu Ntokozo

Abstract

Socio-political change in South Africa, also known as Azania,1 brought about the high hopes and opportunities, especially among the black African majority, in this instance, the recognition and revitalisation of their knowledge systems, in particular, in the learning sphere. The name, Azania becomes more relevant in this discussion, as it divulges the basis of indigenous African knowledge and related methodology systems, specifically on issues that encompass knowledge creation, categorisation and classification of events and circumstances. Nevertheless, the review of literature on the significance of aspects of African knowledge creation such as Tehuti perspective is revealed in this instance. This manuscript posits that diverse paradigms often influence the research approach in a particular milieu. It also suggests that the Tehuti perspective will facilitate the eradication of stereotyping imposed by the narrow cultural perspective in the social sphere including education, especially when it comes to research approach. It concludes by highlighting the need for consideration of diverse knowledge value systems, in particular, when dealing with narratives as indicative of a particular milieu rather than a prescriptive.

Publisher

Lifescience Global

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science,Cultural Studies

Reference34 articles.

1. Afegbua, S. I., & Adejuwon, K. D. 2012. The challenges of leadership and governance in Africa. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(9), 141-157.

2. Amen Ra Un Nefer. 2003. Maat: The 11 Laws of God. Khmait Media Trans Vision: Brookly, New York.

3. Asante, M.K. 2015. The history of Africa: The quest of eternal harmony (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203752951

4. Asante, M. K. Abarry, A. s. 1996. African intellectual heritage: a book of sources. Philadephia, PA: Temple University.

5. Ascione, G. 2016. Decoloning the ‘Global’: The coloniality of method and the problem of the Unit of Analysis. Cultural Sociology, 10(3), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975516644843

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3