Author:
Kamilovska Tatjana Zoroska,Dushkovska Tatjana Shterjova
Abstract
As has been often stated in judicial practice, collective redress simply reflects the rise of mass production, the diversification of corporate ownership, the advent of the mega-corporation, and the recognition of environmental wrongs. Although the American opt-out class actions are the first thing that comes to mind when one thinks of collective redress, European legislators have been particularly wary regarding the possibility of the US “toxic cocktail" finding their way into European legislations. On the other hand, arbitration, in its basis, is a private way of resolving disputes which is a creation of the parties in the dispute. In its basis there must be consent of the parties to submit the particular dispute to be resolved in arbitration proceedings. Therefore, the possibility to incorporate collective redress mechanism in arbitration proceedings might raise many questions.
Reference53 articles.
1. Anderson, Brian, Andrew Trask, The Class Action Playbook, Oxford University Press, New York, 2010.
2. Andrews, Neil, “Multi-Party Litigation In England”, University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper 39/2013 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2330329
3. Backhaus, Jürgen G., Alberto Cassone, Giovanni Ramello, “The Law and Economics of class action litigation: setting the research agenda”, in: The Law and Economics of Class Actions in Europe: Lessons from America, Jürgen G. Backhaus, Alberto Cassone, Giovanni Ramello (eds.), Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2012. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781001240.00006
4. Cappelletti, Mauro, “Vindicating the Public Interest through the Courts: A Comparativist Contribution”, Buffalo Law Review. 25 (1975).
5. Coffee Jr., John C., “Reforming the Securities class actions: an essay of deterrence and its implementation”, Columbia Law review, Vol.106, (2006). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.893833