Evidence-Based Practices during Spontaneous and Cesarean Delivery
Author:
Büyükkal Tuba1ORCID, Yılmaz Tülay2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ-CERRAHPAŞA, LİSANSÜSTÜ EĞİTİM ENSTİTÜSÜ 2. İ.Ü. Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi
Abstract
The aim of this research is to investigate evidence-based practices used for maternal optimal care during birth. Investigating the use of evidence-based practices for spontaneous and cesarean deliveries will contribute to maternal optimal care during delivery. This descriptive and cross-sectional study was completed with 371 women giving birth. The study was conducted in a maternity hospital in Turkey. The Descriptive Information Form and the Optimality Index-Turkey (OI-TR) were used in the data collection. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. In spontaneous and cesarean delivery groups, the nonstress test was performed in 100%. Skin-to-skin contact was not ensured between the mother and neonate in any of them (100%). Also, for spontaneous delivery group labor induction or augmentation was applied to 73.1%, there was no person providing support during labor (except the medical team) in any of them (100%), the non-supine position was not used at birth in any of them (100%) and episiotomy was applied to 59.1%. Our study results point to non evidence-based routine clinical practices in delivery were determined. This situation made the delivery process in the hospital far from optimal. This study revealed that midwives,nurses and clinicans should make knowledge and behavioral changes in their evidence-based practices.
Publisher
Fenerbahce University
Reference56 articles.
1. Alfirevic, Z., Devane, D., Gyte, G. M., & Cuthbert, A. (2017). Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2(2), CD006066. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006066.pub3 2. Al-Ghammari, K., Al-Riyami, Z., Al-Moqbali, M., Al-Marjabi, F., Al-Mahrouqi, B., Al-Khatri, A., & Al-Khasawneh, E. M. (2016). Predictors of routine episiotomy in primigravida women in Oman. Applied Nursing Research, 29, 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APNR.2015.05.002 3. Althabe, F., Belizán, J. M., & Bergel, E. (2002). Episiotomy rates in primiparous women in Latin America: hospital based descriptive study. BMJ : British Medical Journal, 324(7343), 945. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.324.7343.945 4. Baley, J., Watterberg, K., Cummings, J., Eichenwald, E., Poindexter, B., Stewart, D. L., Aucott, S. W., Puopolo, K. M., & Goldsmith, J. P. (2015). Skin-to-Skin Care for Term and Preterm Infants in the Neonatal ICU. Pediatrics, 136(3), 596–599. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-2335 5. Basgol, Ş., & Beji Kizilkaya, N. (2015). Common Practices and Evidence Based Approach in First Stage of Labor. Journal of Duzce University Health Sciences Institute. https://atif.sobiad.com/index.jsp?modul=makale-detay&Alan=saglik&Id=AV4_RhJ9DohDRoFDjNKn
|
|