SCIENTIFIC WAYS OF MASTERING UNCERTAINTY IN A TURBULENT SOCIETY

Author:

Kubalskyi Oleh1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Dobrov Institute for Scientific and Technological Potential and Science History Studies of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

Abstract

Modern society is characterized by permanent challenges that create a situation of the need to preserve the key parameters of social development, taking into account temporary and situational deviations from the strategic direction of this development. The key to understanding the problem of determination in modern science can be the identification of regularities in the development of science itself. On the one hand, there is no doubt about the need to systematize knowledge and adhere to clear scientific criteria – especially in a situation of exponential growth in the volume and variety of knowledge possessed by modern society. On the other hand, science constantly abandons some part of its recent postulates, which turn out to be only partially proven hypotheses that have only partial truth. In the end, only the basic scientific criteria and the instruction for incessant internal criticism and self-improvement of science remain beyond doubts and changes, while the substantive part of science is in a state of permanent transformation and refinement. In a postmodern society, such a methodological and worldview instruction of science receives additional ideological legitimation thanks to postmodern principles of knowledge organization – such as rhizomaticity, discursiveness, narrativism, intertextuality, etc. The signs of science at its current stage of development are: a significant increase in the specific weight of interdisciplinary and interdisciplinary research; emergence of new integrated sciences; the use of accurate methods in the study of methodological and epistemological problems of science and the demarcation of knowledge; search for new forms of research adequate to the latest specificity of the subject of the socio-humanitarian disciplinary spectrum; an intensive analysis of the relationships between the epistemological and axiological foundations of socio-humanitarian science. The research approach, which is based on the understanding of the factor of instability, fully meets the modern scientific and social demand for the designation of the content format and problematic challenges of modernity, provides an opportunity to grasp new cognitive horizons and slices of reality, which are characterized by signs of becoming, nonlinearity, uncertainty – that is, almost all attributes of a turbulent society.

Publisher

V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. Aristotle. (2022). Metaphysics / trans. from Ancient Greek by O. Panych. Kyiv: Tempora. (In Ukrainian).

2. Bauman, Z. (2008). Globalization. Consequences for man and society / trans. from English by I. Andrushchenko, M. Vynnytskyi. Kyiv: Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Publishing House. (In Ukrainian).

3. Boychenko, M. I. (2010). Social-philosophical vision of the system-forming nature of worldview. Bulletin of NTUU "KPI" Philosophy. Psychology Pedagogy. (3), 18-22. (In Ukrainian).

4. Wittgenstein, L. (1995). Tractatus logico-philosophicus / trans. from German by E. Popovych. Wittgenstein L. Tractatus logico-philosophicus; Philosophical studies. Kyiv: Osnovy, p. 5-86. (In Ukrainian).

5. Hume, D. (2003). Treatise on human nature / trans. from English by P. Nasada. Kyiv: Universe. (In Ukrainian).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3