MODERN SOCIAL APPROACHES TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF TOLERANCE-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

MODERN SOCIAL APPROACHES TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF TOLERANCE

Published:2020-12-30 Issue:63 Volume: Page:51-58
ISSN:2414-5904
Container-title:The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series "Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias"
language:uk
Short-container-title:

Author:

Abstract

An important issue in the article is the historical and modern approach to the problem of social tolerance, tracking the historical stages of its development and the current situation. Here it is necessary to distinguish between social tolerance as a phenomenon and a concept. Tolerance, acceptance of diversity – this is the principle of coexistence in intergroup, intercultural relations. Social tolerance ensures stable peaceful interaction of people, public associations and subjects with common and specific views, beliefs and cultures. Although social “tolerance” is a word of Latin origin and is translated into our language as “endurance”, its translation in this sense does not fully cover the content of the concept. Because the word “endurance” has a negative connotation and is essentially a must. This is why tolerance cannot be equated with endurance. The fact that the term “social tolerance” is translated into different languages according to its meaning, for example, “restraint”, “patience”, in our opinion, is a more accurate translation and more adequately reflects its content. In general, the peculiarity of tolerance in intercultural relations is that it acts as a characteristic of a person and a form of self-reflection. Tolerance is a way of dialogue in the presence of foreign, other cultures. The culture of tolerance, which is an integral part of the general culture of the individual, is a philosophical phenomenon and has a broader meaning than the concept of “restraint”.

Publisher

V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Reference15 articles.

1. Astashova, N. A. (2002). Tolerance as a Condition for Self-Expression of Human Individuality. In Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (September 10–12, 2002): Tolerance in the Face of Social and Environmental Crisis (pp. 17–23). Moscow: MSPI; Bryansk: Bryansk State University. (In Russian).

2. Bratchenko, S. L. (1997). Interpersonal Dialogue and its Main Attributes. In Psychology with a Human Face: A Humanist Perspective in Post-Soviet Psychology (pp. 201–222). Moscow: Mysl’. (In Russian).

3. Crantston, M. (1967). Toleration. In P. Edwards (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Vol. 8, pp. 143–146). New York: Macmillan.

4. Drynkina, T. I. (2011). Phenomenology of Tolerance. Tolerance in the Modern World: The Experience of Interdisciplinary Research. In Proceedings of the I International Scientific-Practical Conference (December 1–2, 2011) (pp. 52–54). Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University Publishing House. (In Russian).

5. Gaganova, O. K. (2002). The Concept of “Multicultural Education” in American Pedagogy: Stages of Formation and Definitions. The World of Education – Education in the World, 4, 173–179. (In Russian).