Narrative strategies of dream reports: focalization agencies

Author:

Abstract

The article addresses the issue of the narrative strategy in dream reports as a case study of the English language online dream journals. In the research, I deploy focalization and evidentiality as key aspects for the analysis of narrative strategy in dream reports. The analysis focuses on the specific configurations of focalization types in dream narratives. I consider them as marked by possible divergencies of the “I”-of-the-dream from the “I”-of-the-narration as underpinning the difference between dream reports and personal experience stories. I demonstrate that evidentiality markers serve as means of navigation in narrative spaces. They point to the dream nature of a certain space that is distinct from real world. In my research, I single out focalization and evidentiality markers as pivotal in forming narrative strategy of rendering dream experience. It entails the narrative biases towards objectivity or subjectivity. In the research, I demonstrate that in terms of the subjective narrative strategy, the narrator approaches dreaming as a personal experience. This is manifested, first, in the “I”-of-the-dream being collateral to the “I”-of-the-narration as internal focalizing agency and, secondly, in the use of economical deictic means of navigation in narrative spaces. Conversely, the objective narrative strategy, first, involves external focalizing elements, i.e. the “I”-of-the-dream treated as external to the “I”-of-the narration, and secondly, it is manifest in the detailed propositions signaling the dream nature of the narrative space.

Publisher

V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Reference25 articles.

1. Brokmejer J., Harre R. (2000). Narrativ: problemy i obeshhanija odnoj al'ternativnoj paradigmy [Narative: Problems and Prospects of an Alternative Paradigm]. Voprosy Filosofii [Philosophy Studies], 3, 29–42. (in Russian)

2. Kravchenko N. K. (2014). Narrativ kak diskurs: kategorii, funkcii, metody issledovanija v rakurse sovremennogo diskurs-analiza [Narrative as Discourse: categories, functions, and methods within modern discourse analysis framework]. Odes'kij lіngvіstichnij vіsnik [Odessa Linguistic Journal], 4, 134–139. (in Russian)

3. Leshhenko G. V. (2017). Suchasna kognity`vna naratologiya: napryamy` i priory`tety` doslidzhen` [Modern cognitive narratology: research directions and primary concerns]. Naukovi Zapy`sky` Berdyans`kogo Derzhavnogo Pedagogichnogo Universy`tetu. Ser.: Filologichni nauky` [Scientific Papers of Berdyansk State Pedagogical University. Philology Series], 12, 47–52. (in Ukrainian)

4. Tkachuk O. (2002). Naratologichny`j slovny`k [Narratologic dictionary]. Ternopil`: Aston. (in Ukrainian)

5. Tjupa V. I. (2011). Narrativnaja strategija romana [Narrative strategy of the novel]. Novyj Filologicheskij Vestnik [New Philology Journal], 3(18), 8–25. (in Russian)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3