THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF POPULATION POVERTY MEASUREMENT AS AN INDICATOR OF SOCIAL POLICY EFFICIENCY

Author:

Urchik Gаlina1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. National University of Water Management and Environmental Engineering, Rivne, Ukraine

Abstract

Exacerbation of socio-economic challenges necessitates the assessment of the effectiveness of the social policy, and one of the indicators of which is the level of poverty. This highlights the feasibility of comparing existing methodological approaches to measuring poverty, substantiating their objectivity and the feasibility of using it to assess the effectiveness of the national social policy. The results of the study revealed the diversity of existing approaches to the definition of ‘poverty’, which combines economic, social, and political aspects; the existing approaches and criteria for determining poverty are summarized. The paper specifies the methodological features of assessing the scale of poverty within an objective approach to 1) monetary criteria (absolute and relative poverty line, other monetary limits in accordance with the methodology of the World Bank and the EU), 2) non-monetary poverty line (based on identifying multiple derivations deprivation). The author’s position is that the assessment of the extent of poverty should also be carried out within the framework of a subjective approach, which involves self-identification and self-assessment of their own standard of living (according to the survey). The analytical study of trends and scales of poverty according to all methodological approaches and criteria for its definition is carried out. The novelty of this study is to identify trends and the overall level of effectiveness of national social policy in terms of all indicators of poverty. According to the results of comparative analysis of poverty indicators, the author's position on the objectivity of their reflection of the level of effectiveness of national policy is substantiated, the advantages, disadvantages, expediency and reservations on the application of existing methodological approaches to determining poverty to assess the effectiveness of the social policy.

Publisher

V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Reference22 articles.

1. Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Retrieved from http://www.econlib.org/library/Smith/smWN.html.

2. Bentham, J. (1781). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Retrieved from http://www.utilitarianism.com/jeremy-bentham/index.html.

3. Pareto, V. (1997). Compendium in General Sociology. Anthology of world political thought. Moscow. Vols. 1. (in Russian)

4. Booth, C. (1893). Life and Labour of the People in London. Journal of the royal statistical society. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2979431.

5. Proudhon, P.-J. (1846). Système des contradictions économiques ou Philosophie de la misère. Retrieved from http://surl.li/arrci.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3