National legal regulation of the digital economy and information platforms

Author:

Dunayev Ihor1ORCID,Orlov Oleksandr1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine

Abstract

This article serves as a logical continuation of the authors’ series of publications on the public regulation of information platforms and platform economies. The objective of this article is to provide a concise summary of the rich international experience in national legal regulation of the digital economy and information platforms while identifying pertinent models of such regulation. It further contributes to the ongoing extensive expert and policy debate regarding what, how, and whom to regulate in the new platform environment, in which nearly everyone participates or will soon be involved. Drawing on a comprehensive analysis of legislation in foreign jurisdictions, the article highlights and elucidates three main models of legal regulation for the digital economy, using examples: the model of legislative regulation of the digital economy, the national strategic model, and the regional strategic model. The conclusion is drawn that Ukraine exhibits significant features that largely correspond to the first model. Such a model may involve the creation of specific legislation aimed at digital sector development, stimulating innovation and supporting startups. Nevertheless, Ukraine has already begun to encounter limitations associated with this model, as the digital economy evolves more rapidly than the government and legislators can adapt the legal framework to the latest changes, resulting in regulatory gaps.

Publisher

V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference19 articles.

1. Australia Digital Economy Strategy 2030. (2022). Kanberra. URL: https://www.industry.gov.au/science-technology-and-innovation/technology

2. Digital Economy Act. (2017). URL: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2017/30/contents

3. Dunayev, I., Kovalenko, M. (2022). New traces of regulation of information platforms and a platform-based economy for the new public good. Pressing Problems of Public Administration, 2 (61), 6–24. URL: https://periodicals.karazin.ua/apdu/article/view/21840 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/ 1684-8489-2022-2-01 [in Ukrainian].

4. Dziundziuk, V., Dziundziuk, B. (2022). Public administration using blockchain technology and platforms: new opportunities. Pressing Problems of Public Administration, no. 2 (61), 104–­­­­115. URL: https://periodicals.karazin.ua/apdu/article/view/21848/20248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/1684-8489-2022-2-07 [in Ukrainian].

5. Electronic Transactions Act 2010 (Current version as at 04 Oct 2023) / Singapore Statutes Online. URL: https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/ETA2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3