Public administration using blockchain technology and platforms: new opportunities

Author:

Dziundziuk Viacheslav1ORCID,Dziundziuk Boris1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine

Abstract

This article aims to identify potential applications of blockchain technology in public administration. Although blockchain is most useful when trust in government is low (because blockchain provides greater accountability), the feasibility of implementing blockchain solutions depends on a certain level of administrative and technical capacity of the authorities and, most importantly, on their readiness and willingness to implement these technologies. depends on the following factors. The reluctance to implement blockchain technology is partly related to the perception that blockchain is in “competition” with the state. There are also “usual” political barriers to change in administrative structures, such as the reluctance of government officials to introduce new technologies. The analysis showed that blockchain technology has not yet become widespread in the public sector, although a number of pilot programs have been developed. In addition, many applications of blockchain have not progressed beyond proof of concept and pilot implementations on a limited scale, and further research is needed on the barriers to the adoption of blockchain technology in the public sector, including the issue of the so-called “digital divide”. We know that the consideration of blockchain in public administration can be divided into one or more of the following perspectives: blockchain as a technology of freedom, blockchain as a polycentric structure, or blockchain as a new type of database. Each perspective sheds light on its potential for public sector governance, as blockchain can be all three, depending on the political, economic, social and technological context. The article also identifies that personal data, government procurement, online government services and support for democratic processes are areas where blockchain technology can be successfully used to improve administrative efficiency. However, the analysis also proved that blockchain offers opportunities in almost all areas of public administration, so a special program for implementing blockchain technology in the public sector is needed.

Publisher

V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference25 articles.

1. Allen, D.W.E., Berg, C., Davidson, S., MacDonald, T., and Potts, J. (2021). Building a Grammar of Blockchain Governance. Cryptoeconomics Australia. Retrieved from: https://medium.com/cryptoeconomics-australia/building-a-grammar-of-blockchain-governance-c2cb4b70f915.

2. Allen, D.W.E., Berg, C., and Lane, A.M. (2019). Cryptodemocracy: How Blockchain Can Radically Expand Democratic Choice. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

3. Alston, E., Law, W., Murtazashvili, I., and Weiss, M.B. (2021). Can Permissionless Blockchains Avoid Governance and the Law? Notre Dame Journal of Emergency Technology, 2, 1–32.

4. Alston, E., Law, W., Murtazashvili, I., and Weiss, M. (2022). Blockchain Networks as Constitutional and Competitive Polycentric Orders. Journal of Institutional Economics,1, 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413742100093X

5. Atzori, M. (2015). Blockchain Technology and Decentralized Governance: Is the State Still Necessary? New York: Cambridge University Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3