Affiliation:
1. Ferenc Rákóczi II Transcarpathian Hungarian College of Higher Education, Berehove, Ukraine
Abstract
This paper explored the representation of war in Ukraine, utilizing corpus linguistics methods. It presents the gleanings of the analysis of the international press release covering the period February 24th - November 1st, based on a specialized corpus (1 081 971 tokens) of world newspaper articles compiled for this study. Using the LancsBox software package, a keyword analysis was carried out, providing a window into lexical patterns and typical themes associated with the war in Ukraine. The study highlighted the quantitative characteristics of the target corpus by singling out keywords and their collocates, followed by a qualitative interpretation of their usage in context. The themes commonly referenced in the target corpus were as follows: military intervention, actors/agents, implements, consequences, victims, description and attitudes, resistance, and economy. On the paradigmatic level, the highest occurrences were documented for lexemes war, invasion, and conflict as referents to the concept of ongoing warfare. On the syntagmatic level, lexically rich were the themes of attitudes towards war and its influence on the global economy. Negative discourse prosodies were evident in the discussion of war and some of its agents. In sum, the paper helps understand public attitudes and evaluation of war in the news coverage, which shape the image of Ukraine in the global arena.
Publisher
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University
Reference11 articles.
1. Alzahrani, S., Kim, N., Ozer, M., Ruston, S. W., Schlachter, J., & Corman, S. R. (2018). Framing shifts of the Ukraine conflict in pro-Russian news media. In H. Bisgin, R. Thomson, A. Hyder, & C. Dancy (Eds.), Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling - 11th International Conference, SBP-BRiMS 2018, Proceedings (pp. 303−314). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 10899 LNCS). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93372-6_34
2. Bednarek, M. (2008). Semantic preference and semantic prosody re-examined. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 4(2), 119−139. https://doi.org/10.1515/CLLT.2008.006
3. Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S. (2015). Collocations in context: a new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20, 139−173. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre
4. Dayrell, C., Germond, B. & Germond-Duret, C. (2022). Representation of the Sea in the UK Press: Public Awareness of the Oceans. − A CASS briefing. Project Report. CASS: Corpus Approaches to Social Science, Lancaster University UK. URL: http://cass.lancs.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/02
5. Gabrielatos, C. (2018). Keyness analysis: Nature, metrics and techniques. In C. Taylor & A. Marchi (Eds.), Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review (pp. 225–258). Routledge.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献