Abstract
In the article the author tries to analyze the representation of philosophical and anthropological ideas in the works of fraternal schools in the XVI–XVII centuries. It is noted that man was considered in the unity of soul and body as a microcosm and one that was created in the image of God. Self-knowledge was interpreted as a way of liberation from the burdens of the surrounding world, dependence on earthly sensuality. In particular, Stefan Zizaniy had a rationalist vision of the dogmas of orthodox Christianity. The work of Kyrylo Tranquillion-Stavrovetsky shows a neo-Platonist tradition associated with humanism. In accordance with the traditions of the Renaissance, the philosopher turns to the idea of double truth, considering wisdom from the standpoint of theology and practical philosophy of life. K. Tranquillion-Stavrovetsky, according to the Stoic doctrine, regarded man as a dual nature. But the philosopher also emphasized the unity of soul and body, because they are strongly interconnected. It is noteworthy that the scientist reveals the problem of soul and body from the Renaissance-humanistic moral-ethical and epistemological positions. Isaiah Kopynsky emphasizes that self-knowledge and cognition of the surrounding world does not occur through the study of nature and observation of natural phenomena, but, on the contrary, through immersion in your inner spiritual world through “smart deeds”. It contributes to the knowledge of the outside world, self-knowledge and knowledge of God. I. Kopynsky’s views are close to early Hesychast Byzantine theology. The anthropological views of the theologian are focused on the individual who takes an active part in the historical process. In his works, M. Smotrytsky also pays special attention to the transcendent nature of the human spirit, in particular, analyzing the question of the interaction of action and will. The author concludes that the philosophical and anthropological ideas of the fraternal schools were formed in the context of European philosophical culture and were a reflection of the cultural and historical features of the historical period we are studying.
Publisher
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University
Reference26 articles.
1. Adrug, A. (2012). The First Printed Book in Chernihiv and the Left Bank of Ukraine. Severyansky Chronicle, 5–6, 22–27. (In Ukrainian).
2. Andrusiv, L. (2011). Rationalist Tendencies in Ukrainian Philosophical Thought XI – Beg. of XVII Century. (PhD Thesis). Kyiv: Drahomanov National Pedagogical University. (In Ukrainian).
3. Azovtseva, S. (2013). Kyrylo Tranquillion-Stavrovetsky’s Works in Historical and Literary Works of the XIX–XXI Centuries. Scientific Notes of H. S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University, Series: Literary Studies, 4 (2), 3–8. (In Ukrainian).
4. Bobak, M. (2001). Ideas of Civic Humanism in Ukrainian Spiritual Culture (XVI–XVII Centuries). (PhD Thesis). Lviv: Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. (In Ukrainian).
5. Doichyk, M. (2004). Ethical and Anthropological Ideas of Ukrainian Renaissance Humanism (the End of XVI – First Third of XVII Century). (PhD Thesis). Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. (In Ukrainian).