MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS RESEARCH METHODOLOGY MATTERS IN THE IN MANAGEMENT OF MOTIVATION COMPONENT OF THE BUSINESS PERSONNEL SECURITY

Author:

Зачосова НаталіяORCID,Носань НаталіяORCID,Кімлик Василь

Abstract

It has been established that many methods using qualitative and quantitative indicators are used to study the problem of motivating the personnel of modern companies, assessing the level of motivation, efficiency and loyalty of employees. Expert methods of analysis have gained particular popularity, as they make it possible to justify, explain and specify the obtained results, using the experience of the expert group. Considerable attention should be paid to the process of forming an expert group, determining the level of expertise of experts, planning their number. When using quantitative methods, the emphasis is on the number of indicators that need to be calculated, on establishing permissible deviations from existing normative values, on choosing a scale for scoring, forming ratings. Features, advantages and disadvantages of various research methods of management problems in the management of the motivational component of personnel security of business are summarized. It has been established that quantitative methods have such characteristics as the ability to compare results over time, comprehensibility, and a high level of formalization, however, there are disadvantages such as the complexity of the calculation and the large amount of data required for analysis. Qualitative methods are characterized by such features as the possibility of obtaining expert information and comments, the absence of the need for complex calculations, the possibility of obtaining information from various sources, however, there is a risk of interpretation inaccuracies, a low level of formalization of the methodical procedure and expertise of the expert. Internal research involves the possibility of using information with limited access, specific data, high reliability of information for analysis, however, there is a possibility of subjective interpretation and distortion and concealment of facts. External research is characterized by the professionalism of analysts and third-party experts, the absence of conflict of interests, objectivity and the possibility of comparison with other practices and companies, however, there is a possibility of not being able to take into account the specifics of the company's activities and the peculiarities of its management.

Publisher

Publishing House Helvetica (Publications)

Reference20 articles.

1. Dzwigot H., Dzwigot-Barosz M. (2018) Scientific research methodology in management sciences. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, no. 2(25), pp. 424–437.

2. Bazeley P. (2008) Mixed methods in management research. Richard Thorpe & Robin Holt (Eds). The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Management Research, London: Sage, pp.133–136.

3. Vivek R., Nanthagopan Y. (2021) Review and Comparison of Multi-Method and Mixed Method Application in Research Studies. European Journal of Management Issues, no. 29(4), pp. 200–208.

4. Ustilovska A. S. (2020) Analitychni doslidzhennya suchasnoho rivnya zastosuvannya innovatsiynykh metodiv upravlinnya personalom na pidpryyemstvakhtransportnoyi haluzi [Analytical studies of the modern level of application of innovative methods of personnel management at enterprises of the transport industry]. Ekonomika ta derzhava - Economy and the state, no. 4, pp. 221–231.

5. Popadynets I. R., Kinash I. P. (2019) Motyvatsiya yak chynnyk rozvytku personalu orhanizatsiyi: metodychnyy pidkhid [Motivation as a factor in the development of the organization's personnel: a methodical approach]. Naukovyy visnyk Ivano-Frankivskoho natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu nafty i hazu. Seriya: Ekonomika ta upravlinnya v naftoviy i hazoviy promyslovosti - Scientific Bulletin of the Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas. Series: Economics and management in the oil and gas industry, no. 2, pp. 175–186.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3