The courtroom as a built environment: On the usefulness of Amos Rapoport’s theoretical framework

Author:

Stępień MateuszORCID,Dudek MichałORCID

Abstract

Amos Rapoport is one of the pioneers of the studies on the relationship between people and their environments. At the same time, analyzing the built environment as a factor co-determining human interactions in the courtroom tends to be more and more popular in literature. Following this line, the paper aims to consider whether Rapoport’s theoretical framework (especially its part related to non-verbal communication through the environment) could be fruitfully applied to the study of the courtroom, especially to shed some light on the spatial, physical, or architectural aspects of the courtroom (which is treated as a particular environment). This paper offers a very initial, preliminary examination of the usefulness of Rapoport’s framework in reference to the courtroom interior. What needs to be stressed is that, rather than focusing on a given jurisdiction as a point of reference when elaborating on the usefulness of Rapoport’s framework, the authors try to examine its general applicability.

Publisher

Onati International Institute for the Sociology of Law

Subject

Law,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference52 articles.

1. Altman, I., 2000. Amos Rapoport: Scholar, Conscience and Citizen of the Environment and Behaviour Field. In: K.D. Moore, ed., Culture-meaning-architecture: Critical Reflections on the Work of Amos Rapoport. London: Routledge.

2. Austin, W.T., 1982. Portrait of a Courtroom Social and Ecological Impressions of the Adversary Process. Criminal Justice and Behavior [online], 9(3), 286-302. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854882009003003 [Access 20 September 2021].

3. Barshack, L., 2010. The Constituent Power of Architecture. Law, Culture, and the Humanities [online], 7(2), 217-243. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872109355549 [Access 20 September 2021].

4. Bradley, R.V.V., ‎1970. A Critical Analysis of the Writings of Amos Rapoport. Journal of Architectural Education [online], 24(2/3), 16-25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1970.11102460 [Access 20 September 2021].

5. Branco, P., 2016. Courthouses as Spaces of Recognition, Functionality and Access to Law and Justice: A Portuguese Reflection. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 6(3), 426-441. Available from: https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/497 [Access 20 September 2021].

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. “If not you, then who?”: a qualitative case study of a drug treatment court;Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions;2023-08-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3