Abstract
Starting with an individual report in a leading British periodical of higher education, this article fans outwards to show how the contemporary field of caste studies reflects the degeneracy of its methods and claims. Rather than producing knowledge about India and the so-called caste system, caste studies has worked itself into a corner by creating a set of imagined victims and perpetrators of caste oppression, atrocities, violence and discrimination, and by making unsustainable claims on legal systems and other institutions. The manifold and insurmountable problems of contemporary caste studies include its basis in the European framework for the study of India founded upon Christian theological claims, the carry-over of this account into the secularised humanities and social sciences, and its engagement in corrupted academic practices of the kind that typify grievance studies today. That an alternative account exists in the form of the research programme of SN Balagangadhara, which inspires the articles in this special issue, is good reason for rethinking and revision of the field.
Publisher
Onati International Institute for the Sociology of Law
Subject
Law,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference98 articles.
1. Alexander, J. C., 1982. Theoretical logic in sociology. Vol 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2. Arp, R., Barbone, S., and Bruce, M., eds., 2019. Bad arguments: 100 of the most important fallacies in Western philosophy. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
3. Azevedo, M.A., 2019. Legalistic Mistake. In: R. Arp, S. Barbone, and M. Bruce, eds., Bad arguments: 100 of the most important fallacies in Western philosophy. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 282-285.
4. Balagangadhara, S.N., 2012. Reconceptualizing India studies. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
5. Balagangadhara, S.N., 2017. Caste-based reservation and social justice in India. In: M. Fárek et al., eds., Western foundations of the caste system. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 31-55.