Normalising the use of electronic evidence: Bring technology use into a familiar normative path in civil procedure

Author:

Ontanu Elena Alina

Abstract

Society is increasingly relying on technology for daily business and activities. This is linked to a rapid update in technology use and digitalisation with courts required to consider new forms of in an electronic environment. The global pandemic increased reliance on technology for justice services and accelerated its integration in the handling of claims. This shift has brought with it certain disruptions. The normative framework concerning electronic evidence is fragmented and still underdeveloped. The handling of new forms of evidence clashes with the traditional paper-based formats that are not able to display all the characteristics of electronic documents. The new Taking of Evidence Regulation (Regulation 2020/1783) adds provisions related to this type of evidence, but this is only partly sufficient for completing the legal framework. In analysing the integration of this new type of evidence into legal practice, the work of Canguilhem regarding the normal and pathological is used.

Publisher

Onati International Institute for the Sociology of Law

Subject

Law,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference40 articles.

1. Bayard, F., 2020. Aanbevelingen ingevolge corona (College van hoven en rechtbanken). Legal News [online], 13 March. Available from: https://legalnews.be/geschillen-procedure/aanbevelingen-ingevolge-corona-college-van-hoven-en-rechtbanken/ [Accessed 8 April 2022].

2. Biasiotti, M.A., 2018. Present and Future of the Exchange of Electronic Evidence in Europe. In: M.A. Biasiotti et al., eds., Handling and Exchanging Electronic Evidence Across Europe. Cham: Springer, 13-32.

3. Biasiotti, M.A., et al., 2018. Introduction: Opportunities and Challenges for Electronic Evidence. In: M.A. Biasiotti et al., eds., Handling and Exchanging Electronic Evidence Across Europe. Cham: Springer, 3-12.

4. Borsari, G., and Velicogna, M., 2011. Executive summary. In: G. Borsari et al., eds., e-CODEX deliverable 7.1 governance and guidelines definition (v. 1), 10-12.

5. Canguilhem, G., 1991. The Normal and the Pathological. New York: Zone Books.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3