A Comparison Of Respiratory Function Parameters Of The Individuals Recovered From Mild Covid-19 And Their Non-Infected Counterparts
Author:
KOÇ Murat1ORCID, COŞKUN Betül1ORCID, ÖNİZ Muhammed1ORCID, SARITAŞ Nazmi1ORCID
Abstract
Purpose: The COVID-19 epidemic especially attacks the immune and respiratory system, causing intensive care and deaths. Even if the post-illness tests of COVID-19 patients are negative, the effects, especially related to respiratory system, defined as post-covid-19 may continue. The objective of this study is to compare the body composition and chosen respiratory parameters between the adults surviving the disease mildly and their non-infected counterparts.
Material and Methods: 60 sedentary adults (positive n=12 and negative n=24 male; positive n=15 and negative n=9 female) participated in the study voluntarily. The groups were named as positive (in the last 6 months) and negative (non-infected). Body composition and respiratory parameters such as vital capacity, forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in one second, forced expiratory flow between 25%-75% of vital capacity, tiffeneau index and peak expiratory flow rate measurements were taken.
Results: According to the Independent samples t-test results, no statistically significant difference was found between the spirometric values of the sedentary adults who had COVID-19 six months ago and their non-infected counterparts (p>0.05).
Conclusion: As a result of the study, it is believed that the respiratory functions of the patients who survived COVID-19 mildly may have returned to normal after 6 months.
Publisher
Cankiri Karatekin Universitesi
Reference37 articles.
1. Al Ghobain, M. O., Alhamad, E. H., Alorainy, H. S., Al Hazmi, M., Al Moamary, M. S., Al-Hajjaj, M. S., . . . Zeitouni, M. J. T. c. r. j. (2014). Spirometric reference values for healthy nonsmoking S audi adults. 8(1), 72-78. 2. Behrens, G., Matthews, C. E., Moore, S. C., Hollenbeck, A. R., & Leitzmann, M. F. (2014). Body size and physical activity in relation to incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cmaj, 186(12), E457-E469. doi:https://doi. org/10.1503/cmaj.140025 3. Clavario, P., De Marzo, V., Lotti, R., Barbara, C., Porcile, A., Russo, C., . . . Caltabellotta, M. (2020). Assessment of functional capacity with cardiopulmonary exercise testing in non-severe COVID-19 patients at three months follow-up. MedRxiv. doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.15.20231985 4. De Graaf, M. A., Antoni, M. L., ter Kuile, M. M., Arbous, M. S., Duinisveld, A. J. F., Feltkamp, M. C. W., . . . Roukens, A. H. E. (2021). Short-term outpatient follow-up of COVID-19 patients: A multidisciplinary approach. EClinicalMedicine, 32, 100731. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100731 5. Enright, P. L., Connett, J. E., & Bailey, W. (2002). The FEV1/ FEV6 predicts lung function decline in adult smokers. Respiratory medicine, 96(6), 444-449.
|
|