Platform Strategiarchy as a Tool for Reducing Information Asymmetry, Taking into Account the Scale, Cardinality and Order of the Strategy

Author:

Vyshnevskyi О.ORCID,

Abstract

The purpose of study is to substantiate the conceptual foundations of reducing information asymmetry using platform strategiarchy taking into account scale, cardinality and order of the strategy. The scientific novelty obtained as a result of the research lies in the description of new scientific concepts: strategiarchy, platform strategiarchy, information asymmetry, scale of strategy, cardinality of strategy, order of strategy scale. The introduction of which allows us to form a scientific and theoretical basis for the further institutionalization of strategizing, which creates conditions for reducing information asymmetry in the process of developing the digital economy. In a broad sense, strategiarchy is a model of social structure aimed at increasing subjectivity in society and minimizing information asymmetry through the institutionalization of strategizing. Key characteristics of strategiarchy: 1. Every capable individual and legal entity has a public strategy. 2. Every capable individual and legal entity has the ability and opportunity to evaluate any strategy (of the other capable individual and legal entity). In a narrow sense, strategiarchy is a system for coordinating strategies at various levels of governance and management. In other words, strategiarchy is the result of ascent from the abstract (general theory of strategizing) to the concrete (digital platform for strategy consolidation). The implementation of strategiarchy using a digital platform is called platform strategiarchy. The introduction of the concepts “scale of strategy”, “cardinality of strategy”, “order of strategy scale” allows you to organize and compare strategies, including on the appropriate digital platform. The scale of strategy is equal to the product of influence and resource of the subject of strategy implementation. The quantitative assessment of the "resource" is determined by the number of employees of the organization. "Impact" is quantified through the number of customers or stakeholders. The cardinality of a strategy is defined as the square root of the scale of the strategy. The order of strategy cardinality is determined by the order of the number characterizing the cardinality of the strategy, i.e. the decimal logarithm of the power. The calculation of these characteristics is demonstrated on specific examples (United Nations, USA, Facebook, Kiev, Ilon Musk, Felix Arvid Ulf Kjellberg, Robinson Crusoe). As a result, placing strategies on digital platforms allows to reduce information asymmetry in various communications between companies, government and individuals.

Publisher

Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University

Reference12 articles.

1. George A. Akerlof, A. Michael Spence, Joseph E. Stiglitz: Information for the Public, Markets with Asymmetric Information. Nobel Prize in Economics documents 2001-1. The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel. (2001). Committee Nobel Prize. Retrieved from https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2001/popular-information/.

2. Kant, I. (2021). Perpetual Peace. A Philosophical Essay. [EBook #50922]. Retrieved from: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/50922/50922-h/50922-h.htm#Page_185.

3. Mutascu, M., Sokic, A. (2023). Do online social networks affect information asymmetry? Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management. 11(2):1-24. DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.36965/OJAKM.2023.11(2)1-24.

4. Dang, D., Korkos, I., Wu, W. (2023). The effects of earnings management on information asymmetry and stock price synchronicity. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11 (2). DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2290359.

5. Wijaya, J., Herwiyanti, E. (2023). A study of information asymmetry in financial research. The Indonesian Accounting Review, Vol. 13, No. 1, January - June, рр. 79 - 89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v13i1.2935.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3