Providing Insights into the Challenges of Implementing Activity-Based Therapy in Canada: A Comparative Analysis Using Focus Group Interviews with Key Interest Groups

Author:

Kaiser Anita123,Chan Katherine2,Sessford James2,McCullum Shane4,Athanasopoulos Peter5,Rice Chris2,Leo Jennifer6,MacRitchie Iona7,Zariffa José1289,Musselman Kristin E.1210

Affiliation:

1. 1 Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada;

2. 2 KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada;

3. 3 Canadian Spinal Research Organization, Richmond Hill, ON, Canada;

4. 4 Stan Cassidy Centre for Rehabilitation, Horizon Health Network, Fredericton, NB, Canada;

5. 5 Spinal Cord Injury Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada;

6. 6 The Steadward Centre for Personal & Physical Achievement, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada;

7. 7 Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada;

8. 8 Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada;

9. 9 Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada;

10. 10 Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Abstract

Background Activity-based therapy (ABT) has emerged as a therapeutic approach that may promote neurorecovery and reduce secondary complications in people living with spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D). In spite of the numerous health benefits, adoption of ABT into practice has been limited across the Canadian care continuum. Objectives This study aimed to understand the challenges of implementing ABT in Canada for people living with SCI/D through the perspectives of key interest groups. Methods Researchers, hospital therapists, community trainers, administrators, persons living with SCI/D, and advocates, funders, and policy experts who had knowledge of and/or experience with ABT participated in focus group interviews to share their perspectives on the barriers to ABT practice. Interviews were analyzed using conventional content analysis followed by a comparative analysis across groups. Results The 48 participants identified six key challenges: (1) challenge of gaps in knowledge/training, (2) challenge of standardizing ABT, (3) challenge of determining the optimal timing of ABT, (4) challenge of defining, characterizing, and achieving high dosage and intensity, (5) challenge of funding ABT, and (6) challenge of measuring participation and performance in ABT. A comparative analysis found some challenges were emphasized by certain groups, such as the cost of ABT for persons with SCI/D, lack of education and training in ABT for therapists and trainers, minimal evidence to develop guidelines for researchers and advocates, and funding ABT programs for administrators. Conclusion Participants highlighted several challenges that limit ABT practice. Strategies to address these challenges will support successful implementation of ABT in Canada.

Publisher

American Spinal Injury Association

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3