Comparative Analysis of Various Approaches to Calculating Labour Productivity

Author:

Volkova Nataliia N.1ORCID,Romanyuk Evelyna I.1ORCID,Frenkel Alexander A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of analyzing the methodological foundations for assessing the dynamics of labour productivity in the regions of Russia in the context of the digital transformation of the economy. The identification of differences in the level of labour productivity and employment and the influencing factors is a necessary requirement for building a competent regional socio-economic policy in the new institutional conditions. Calculations of labour productivity are carried out by various international and national organizations that use a variety of methods for measuring this indicator. The presence of a sufficiently large number of methods for measuring productivity leads to the fact that each one gives its own result and different dynamics. The authors set the task to consider the existing methodological approaches to calculating labor productivity and to analyze how much they affect the results. The authors statistically tested the hypothesis of heterogeneity of ratings obtained by various methods. The calculations were made on the basis of data from Rosstat for the regions of Russia for the period from 2013 to 2018. To study the uniformity of the series, various statistical criteria were used. The analysis showed that in all years of the period under review the samples are heterogeneous. Consequently, the development of managerial decisions substantially depends on the methodology used to calculate the labour productivity index. The authors concluded that it is necessary to build an index of labour productivity based on regression dependencies on indicators reflecting the main factors affecting regional labor productivity. It helps to get a more effective assessment of regional differences in its level and dynamics. This index should be built for each region taking into account its industry specifics and the level of development of new digital technologies.

Publisher

RPO for the Promotion of Institutes DE RAS

Reference20 articles.

1. Aganbegyan A. G. (1979). Management of socialist production: issues of theory and practice. Moscow, Ekonomika. 448 р. (in Russian).

2. Ayvazyan S. A. (1968). Statistical study of dependencies. Moscow, Metallurgy. 176 р. (in Russian).

3. Andreeva L.Yu., Dgemayev O. T. (2017). The impact of digital economy on the formation of new trends in the Russian labor market. State and Municipal Management. Scientific Notes of SKAGS, no. 34, pp. 25–32 (in Russian).

4. Bessonov V. A., Gimpelson V. E., Yasin E. G., Kuzminov Ya.I. (2010). Productivity and factors of long-term development of the Russian. X International scientific conference on economic and social development. Moscow, Publishing house of HSE (Higher School of Economics), pp. 11–61 (in Russian).

5. Burtseva T. A. (2017). Econometric models of regional labor productivity. Voprosy Statistiki (Problems of Statistics), no. 3, pp. 30–36 (in Russian).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3