Affiliation:
1. Central Economics and Mathematics Institute at the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow;
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow;
State University of Management, Moscow
Abstract
The article discusses the ways of creating unified economic theory describing the functioning and interaction of significant units of the national economy and the economy as a whole. The general construction of a unified economic theory, its connection with the system economic theory and its system components (object, process, project, environmental economic theories) is determined. Based on the example of institutional economic theory, it is shown that the expansion of its terminology and conceptual apparatus within the framework of the construction of a unified multi-level economic theory allows minimizing the contradictions between the “old” and “new” institutionalism, methodological individualism and methodological holism. This expansion is carried out following the principle of the maximum possible system community in two lines. The first line is expanding the subject area (along with organizations as systems of the object type, systems of the process, project, the environment types are also considered as the focal subject of study). The second line is the expanding the instrumental area (analysis of the influence on the behavior of agents from not only institutional subsystems but also information, infrastructural, network, mental, and other environmental subsystems). As a result, each system receives the compact and maximum volumetric internal systemic content and, at the same time, the minimum volumetric external systemic environment, which creates conditions for the effective application of the duality principle in the theory of economic systems. Thus, the system expansion of institutional theory should take place in two lines: content of the theory per se and creation of its immediate environment.
Publisher
RPO for the Promotion of Institutes DE RAS
Reference20 articles.
1. Akaev A. A. (2011). Strategic management of sustainable development based on the theory of innovation-cyclical economic growth of Schumpeter-Kondratyev. Economics and Management, no. 3, pp. 4–10 (in Russian).
2. Gorshkov A. V. (2012). Can economic theory be universal, or why do we need a theory of the national economy of Russia? Bulletin of the Ural State University of Economics, no. 4 (42),
3. pp. 11–19 (in Russian).
4. Grigoryev L. (2017). Two discourses in Russian economic science. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 9, pp. 135–158 (in Russian). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2017-9-135-158
5. Kirdina S. (2013). Methodological individualism and methodological institutionalism. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 10, pp. 66–89 (in Russian). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2013-10-66-89
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献