Possibilities of the Economic Institutionalism’ Integration

Author:

Tambovtsev Vitaly L.1

Affiliation:

1. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow

Abstract

The article is devoted to the search and substantiation of the answer to the question whether it is possible to combine the original and new institutional economics. For this, first, methodological holism and methodological individualism are compared, which share the aforementioned directions of economic institutionalism. It is concluded that these methodological principles are logically incompatible in their ontological foundations, but they are close in the types of the analyzed processes and phenomena explanations. Secondly, the definitions of the institution are compared, which are usually used in these areas. From their comparison, it is concluded that the understanding of the institution in the new institutional economics is more productive than that followed by the supporters of the original institutional economics. In the final part of the article, it is concluded that the convergence of the two institutionalisms is possible through the deployment of a discussion based on the results of empirical research, which can show the participants the advantages and disadvantages of the scientific methods used. Methodological discussions are considered unproductive.

Publisher

RPO for the Promotion of Institutes DE RAS

Reference22 articles.

1. Auzan A. A. (ed.) (2011). Institutional economics: New institutional economics. 2nd ed. Moscow: INFRA-M (in Russian).

2. Biryu­kov V. (2018). Culturological paradigm of the perception of economic reality. Society and Economy, no. 9, pp. 91–101 (in Russian).

3. Kuzminov Ya.I., Yudkevich M. M. (2002). Ins­titutional economics: Lectures Course. Moscow: Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology State University (MIPT) (in Russian). URL: https://mipt.ru/dbmp/upload/3f2/NIElec-arphlf43tys.pdf

4. Polterovich V. (2016). Positive collaboration: Factors and mechanisms of evolution. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 1, pp. 5–23 (in Russian).

5. Tambovtsev V. L. (2021). Is Unified Institutional Economics Possible? Voprosy Economiki, no. 1, pp. 33–51 (in Russian).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3