FINANCING THE PATRONIZED GOODS IN THE HUMANITARIAN SECTOR OF ECONOMY (Experience of Institutional Research)

Author:

Rubinshtein A. Ya.1

Affiliation:

1. Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences, State Institute for Art Studies

Abstract

The article presents the rationale for the investment activity of the state, directly aimed at the realization of the society’s interests, as well as for the reform activities, the task of which is to modernize the institutional environment in order to maximally harmonize the interests of society and economic agents. Within the framework of the first direction, an original approach and a corresponding method of determining the volume of public investment to producers of patronized goods in the humanitarian sector are proposed, based on an assessment of the necessary compensation of the deficit in their income, arising as a result of objective economic patterns and social norms, established by the state. Within the framework of the second direction the need for institutional changes is discussed, which pushes the state to reform existing institutions in order to generate additional motivation for expanding the production of patronized goods, as a result of the maximum possible convergence of interests of economic agents and society as a whole. It is about creating economic incentives and generally favorable conditions for attracting to the humanitarian sector, including non-governmental non-profit organizations, as well as commercial organizations that have their own interests, sometimes far from the public goals of increasing human capital. As a general vector of institutional modernization of the conditions of cultural, educational and scientific activities, it was recommended to use institutions of individual budget assignments, tax benefits, marked taxes and endowment funds. The final part of the research is devoted to analyzing the consequences of the “flaw in public choice” – the proclamation of a growing number of journal publications and the peculiarities of institutional modernization of science, including the “journal reform”, as a public interest. It was recommended to develop a Federal program of state support to the scientific journals, ensuring their efficient operation, including paying fees to authors and reviewers, as well as allocating targeted subsidies to university and academic research libraries to pay for subscriptions to major scientific journals. 

Publisher

RPO for the Promotion of Institutes DE RAS

Reference48 articles.

1. Sunstein C., Thaler R. (2003). Libertarian Paternalism. American Economic Review, vol. 93, pp. 175–179.

2. Akerlof G. A. (1970). The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 84, August, рp. 488–500.

3. Abankina T. V., Kushtanina E. V., Romanova V. V., Rudnik B. L. (2014). State support of culture. Moscow: Higher School of Economics (in Russian).

4. Balatsky E.V., Ekimova N. A. (2015). The problem of manipulation in the RISC system. Bulletin of URFU. Series “Economics and Management”, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 166–178 (in Russian).

5. Becker G. S. (2003). Human behavior: an economic approach. Moscow: SU–Higher School of Economics, 672 p. (in Russian).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Allocation Of The Boundaries Of The Russian Culture Industry;European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences;2021-04-16

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3