COMPARISON OF THE CONDITION OF THE PERI-IMPLANT ORAL MUCOUS ACCORDING TO THE RESULTS OF DIGITAL MICROSCOPY
Author:
Korol Dmytro, Yefimenko ArtemORCID, Korol MykhailoORCID
Abstract
The object of the study there is a level of hyperemia of the mucous membrane around the installed intraosseous dental implants with different coating material according to the results of histogram analysis of digital microscopy. The problem to be solved – evaluation of the degree of hyperemia of the periimplant mucosa around intraosseous dental implants coated with rutile, in comparison with titanium implants of VT-6 alloy after prosthetics. Main scientific results: Analysis of digital images using histogram evaluation of the red component of the spectrum showed that 1 month after prosthetics in group 1, which included 20 patients who had intraosseous implants made of titanium alloy TiV6Al (VT-6), the above indicator increased to 191 (St.Err. 4.45). The difference was 4 conventional units. Similarly, in group 2 (16 people) who had intraosseous zirconium implants, there was an increase in the quantitative rate after prosthetics by 9 conventional units, and its value was 194 conventional units (St.Err. 3.64). Since increasing numerical values and shifting the digital histogram to the right is an objective criterion for reducing the intensity of redness, it can be concluded that there is a reduction of mucosal irritation after orthopedic treatment with a predominance of this process in the group of patients who received intraosseous dental implants coated with rutile. The area of practical use of research results: Since the authors first studied the reaction of the peri-implant mucosa in contact with various implant materials at the stages of orthopedic treatment, this is the basis for the introduction into general medical practice of intraosseous dental implants made in Ukraine using rutile application technology. The area of application of an innovative technological product - it is a dental implant practice. The obtained results will allow to use more widely Ukrainian implants of non-demountable construction with a high level of surface preparation, for the purpose of further orthopedic treatment with the use of non-removable metal-ceramic dentures.
Publisher
OU Scientific Route
Reference10 articles.
1. Slinko, Y. O., Sokolova, I. I., Udovichenko, N. M. (2019). The Prevalence of Dental Defects in the Adult Population of Kharkiv Region. Ukrainskij Žurnal Medicini, Biologii Ta Sportu, 4 (6), 260–264. doi: http://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs04.06.260 2. Pjetursson, B. E., Tan, K., Lang, N. P., Bragger, U., Egger, M., Zwahlen, M. (2004). A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. I. Implant-supported FPDs. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 15 (6), 625–642. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01117.x 3. Riaz, W., Ayesha, A., Aziz, S. (2018). Dental prosthesis; assessment of grades of failures of conventional fixed dental prosthesis based on severity. The Professional Medical Journal, 25 (8), 1261–1264. doi: http://doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/18.4488 4. Brånemark, P. I., Hansson, B. O., Adell, R., Breine, U., Lindström, J., Hallén, O., Ohman, A. (1977). Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 16, 1–132. 5. Osman, R., Swain, M. (2015). A Critical Review of Dental Implant Materials with an Emphasis on Titanium versus Zirconia. Materials, 8 (3), 932–958. doi: http://doi.org/10.3390/ma8030932
|
|