Affiliation:
1. National university “Kyiv-Mohyla academy”
2. Taras Shevchnko National University of Kyiv
Abstract
The purpose of the research paper is to examine the differences between e-government and smart government and how will smart governments benefit modern public administrations and service delivery. It seeks to compare and contrast between smart government and e-government. In addition, it compares the application of smart government and e-government in the United States and Jordan. The research idea is based on the observation that the concept of e-government is relatively new in the modern world. Nevertheless, it has, in the last few decades, enabled governments to serve citizens using the internet technology. In addition, technology has allowed governments to obtain, process, manipulate, store, retrieve and report data on an efficient and reliable manner. The term ‘e-government’ refers to the development, adoption and use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) to improve the service delivery and activities of the public sector. Although there are many definitions of the term, it is generally agreed that the use of internet-enabled application to allow interactions between the government and outside groups are the key aspects of e-Government. An in-depth research method is based on the qualitative search of information from 13 credible sources. The study finds that the domain of E-Administration involves the initiatives that deal with improving internal working in the public sector. Further, it finds several differences and similarities between Jordan’s E-government model and that adopted from the US. It finds that America has a longer history of using digital systems in public service provision. Also, United States is already moving from e-government to Smart Government System. Jordan’s new system is still an e-government establishment rather than a Smart Government system, despite the fact that both systems have related objectives.
Reference19 articles.
1. Alenezi, H., Tarhini, A., Sharma, S. K. (2015). Development of quantitative model to investigate the strategic relationship between information quality and e-government benefits. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 9 (3), 324–351. doi: 10.1108/tg-01-2015-0004
2. The open data economy: unlocking economic value by opening government and public data (2013). Capgemini Worldwide, 17. Available at: https://www.capgemini-consulting.com/resource-file-access/resource/pdf/opendata_pov_6feb.pdf
3. Federal budget provides funding to create open data institute (2014). Digitaljournal.com. Available at: http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/1732697
4. Gurstein’s Community Informatics. Open data: empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone? (2010). Available at: http://gurstein.wordpress.com/2010/09/02/open-data-empowering-the-empowered-or-effective-data-use-for-everyone/
5. Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C., Moon, M. J. (2004). Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15 (3), 371–391. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mui021
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献