Abstract
This study aims to integrate the Balanced Scorecard and Risk Management at Shofa Pharmacy and its one branch. The risk assessment is based on the ISO 31000 framework model and the Balanced Scorecard is based on a financial perspective, a customer perspective, an internal business perspective and a learning and growth perspective. The results of risk identification show that the risks, faced by Shofa Pharmacy, are financial risk, operational risk, technology risk, business ethics risk, health and safety risk, economic risk, legal risk, political risk, market risk, and project risk. Based on the results of the analysis, the highest risk is a technology risk with the risk group in information technology protection, economic risk with the fall in a demand risk group, political risk with an inflation risk group and project risk with an evaluation risk group, then risk management is carried out to reduce the risk level.
Reference13 articles.
1. Burhaein, E., Tarigan, B., Phytanza, D. T. P. (2020). The experiences and understandings of the K-13 curriculum implementation of Indonesian teachers of Adapted Physical Education (APE). International Sports Studies, 42 (3), 29–42. doi: http://doi.org/10.30819/iss.42-e.04
2. Burhaein, E., Phytanza, D. T. P., Demirci, N. (2020). The development and validation of a revised Friendship Activity Scale and Adjective Checklist for use in the Indonesian Unified Sports program. International Sports Studies, 42 (3), 18–28. doi: http://doi.org/10.30819/iss.42-e.03
3. Kemenkes, R. I. (2019). Profil Kesehatan Indonesia Tahun 2019. Jakarta: Kemeterian Kesehatan R. I.
4. Beasley, M., Chen, A. Y., Nunez, K., Wright, L. (2006). Working Hand in Hand: Balanced Scorecard and Enterprise Risk Management. Strategic Finance, 87 (1), 49–55.
5. Porter, M. E. (2007). Competitive Strategy.