Fringe Glycosyltransferases Differentially Modulate Notch1 Proteolysis Induced by Delta1 and Jagged1
-
Published:2005-02
Issue:2
Volume:16
Page:927-942
-
ISSN:1059-1524
-
Container-title:Molecular Biology of the Cell
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:MBoC
Author:
Yang Liang-Tung1, Nichols James T.1, Yao Christine1, Manilay Jennifer O.2, Robey Ellen A.2, Weinmaster Gerry13
Affiliation:
1. Department of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1737 2. Division of Immunology, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 3. Molecular Biology Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1737
Abstract
Fringe O-fucose-β1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases modulate Notch signaling by potentiating signaling induced by Delta-like ligands, while inhibiting signaling induced by Serrate/Jagged1 ligands. Based on binding studies, the differential effects of Drosophila fringe (DFng) on Notch signaling are thought to result from alterations in Notch glycosylation that enhance binding of Delta to Notch but reduce Serrate binding. Here, we report that expression of mammalian fringe proteins (Lunatic [LFng], Manic [MFng], or Radical [RFng] Fringe) increased Delta1 binding and activation of Notch1 signaling in 293T and NIH 3T3 cells. Although Jagged1-induced signaling was suppressed by LFng and MFng, RFng enhanced signaling induced by either Delta1 or Jagged1, underscoring the diversity of mammalian fringe glycosyltransferases in regulating signaling downstream of different ligand-receptor combinations. Interestingly, suppression of Jagged1-induced Notch1 signaling did not correlate with changes in Jagged1 binding as found for Delta1. Our data support the idea that fringe glycosylation increases Delta1 binding to potentiate signaling, but we propose that although fringe glycosylation does not reduce Jagged1 binding to Notch1, the resultant ligand–receptor interactions do not effectively promote Notch1 proteolysis required for activation of downstream signaling events.
Publisher
American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB)
Subject
Cell Biology,Molecular Biology
Reference64 articles.
1. Almqvist, N., Bhatia, R., Primbs, G., Desai, N., Banerjee, S., and Lal, R. (2004). Elasticity and adhesion force mapping reveals real-time clustering of growth factor receptors and associated changes in local cellular rheological properties.Biophys. J.86, 1753-1762. 2. Artavanis-Tsakonas, S., Rand, M. D., and Lake, R. J. (1999). Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development.Science284, 770-776. 3. Aster, J. C., Robertson, E. S., Hasserjian, R. P., Turner, J. R., Kieff, E., and Sklar, J. (1997). Oncogenic forms of NOTCH1 lacking either the primary binding site for RBP-Jkappa or nuclear localization sequences retain the ability to associate with RBP-Jkappa and activate transcription.J. Biol. Chem.272, 11336-11343. 4. Bland, C. E., Kimberly, P., and Rand, M. D. (2003). Notch induced proteolysis and nuclear localization of the Delta ligand.J. Biol. Chem.278, 13607-13610. 5. Brou, C., Logeat, F., Gupta, N., Bessia, C., LeBail, O., Doedens, J. R., Cumano, A., Roux, P., A., B. R., and Israel, A. (2000). A novel proteolytic cleavage involved in Notch signaling: the role of the disintegrin-metalloprotease TACE.Mol. Cell5, 207-216.
Cited by
182 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|