An Analysis of the Efficacy of South African MBA Programmes in relation to the 4th Industrial Revolution

Author:

Suleman AamirORCID,Nieuwenhuizen CecileORCID,Meyer Natanja

Abstract

Background: MBA programmes are considered flagship business programmes for business individuals. Business schools are often revered for being cutting-edge and critical business thought centres. However, over the years, programmes such as the MBA have been criticised due to their relevance. Changes such as the Covid-19 pandemic, the 4th Industrial Revolution, and increasing global political instability have resulted in harsher trading environments for business. As the business landscape evolves, so too are business schools’ programmes, such as the MBA, required to evolve. Purpose: This study explored the efficacy of a sample of South African MBA programmes concerning their perceived efficacy in developing leaders fit for the 4th Industrial Revolution. Methodology: The study conducted a series of semi-structured qualitative interviews with identified stakeholders relating to the business school ecosystem to explore perceived opinions of the efficacy of business schools in programmes such as the MBA. Findings: The analysis from the interviews revealed that MBA programmes in South Africa need to enhance their focus on aspects such as technology-linked technical skills, as this is a key driver that continues to shape the business landscape.

Publisher

UNISA Press

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference30 articles.

1. American Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. 2010. “Business Schools on an Innovation Mission.” Report of the AACSB Task Force on Business Schools and Innovation, Tampa, Florida.

2. Bartholomew, T., E. Joy, E. Kang, and J. Brown. 2021. “A Choir or Cacophony: Sample Sizes and Quality of Conveying Participants’ Voices in Phenomenological Research. Methodological Innovations,” 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991211040063.

3. Bughin, J., E. Hazan, S. Lund, P. Dahlstrom, A. Wiesinger, and A. Subramaniam. 2018. “Skill Shift Automation and the Future of the Workforce.” Accessed July 20, 2020. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Featured%20Insights/Future%20of%20Organizations/Skill%20shift%20Automation%20and%20the%20future%20of%20the%20workforce/MGI-Skill-Shift-Automation-and-future-of-the-workforce-May-2018.ashx.

4. DeJonckheere, M., and L. Vaughn. 2019. Family Medicine and Community Health, 1–08.

5. Deloitte. 2018. “Preparing Tomorrow’s Workforce for the Fourth Industrial Revolution.” Accessed July 15, 2020. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/About-Deloitte/gx-preparing-tomorrow-workforce-for-4IR.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3