A Design Thinking Approach to Disentangle the Wicked Problem of Re-Curriculation during a Pandemic

Author:

Lubbe Johanna Catharina (Irene)ORCID,Adam SumaiyaORCID,Cordier Werner

Abstract

Covid-19 continues to cause major disruptions and unique challenges in the higher education sector. Some of the most profound disruptions are in health sciences where students depend on current, up-to-date information, interdisciplinary collaboration, and work-integrated learning to acquire the needed skill set to become proficient clinical practitioners. Combining the Covid-19 pandemic with emergency remote teaching and an outdated 25-year-old non-responsive, fragmented curriculum created the perfect storm for a wicked problem. (A problem that is almost impossible to solve due to incomplete, contradictory, and changing requirements that are often difficult to recognise.) In this article, the authors share their journey-in-process of design thinking disentanglement to solve this current and wicked problem. Shortly before the start of the pandemic, the specific medical school under study embarked on a re-curriculation process—a process that was rudely and abruptly distorted and tangled by the pandemic. However, despite the initial setback, they continue with this mammoth task, basing their activities on “design thinking” principles. They purposively approach this task from within a human-centred, value-based, solution-focused, action-orientated and systematic reasoning process.  The five intertwined, non-linear design thinking phases of empathise (stake-holder analysis and data collection), define (data analysis and problem statement), ideate (possible solutions), prototype (integrated draft curriculum) and test (stake-holder feedback and input) were adopted as a method to facilitate and expedite the re-curriculation process. The process discussed in this manuscript has value beyond the health sciences. The approach to storyboarding, creating, and unpacking a new curriculum is applicable to all disciplines in multiple educational settings.

Publisher

UNISA Press

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference32 articles.

1. Benn, S., R. Abratt, and B. O’Leary. 2016. “Defining and Identifying Stakeholders: Views from Management and Stakeholders.” South African Journal of Business Management 47 (2): a55. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v47i2.55.

2. Buchanan, R. 1992. “Wicked Problems in Design Thinking.” Design Issues 8 (2): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637.

3. Dam, R. F. 2022. “The 5 Stages in the Design Thinking Process.” Interaction Design Foundation, April 1, 2022. Accessed September 28, 2023. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process.

4. Department of Health. 2017. Saving Mothers 2014–2016: Seventh Triennial Report on the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in South Africa: Executive Summary. Pretoria: Department of Health. Accessed April 1, 2022. https://www.westerncape.gov.za/assets/departments/health/saving_mothers_2014-16_executive_summary.pdf.

5. Du Preez, P., S. Simmonds, and A. H. Verhoef. 2016. “Rethinking and Researching Transformation in Higher Education: A Meta-Study of South African Trends.” Transformation in Higher Education 1 (1): a2. https://doi.org/10.4102/the.v1i1.2.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3