Abstract
State policies regarding workers’ education and the education and training of adults and communities have been hugely influenced by the political and ideological perspectives and approaches that have informed such policies from the onset of the post-apartheid period. These approaches have had pervasively negative effects on especially workers’ education. Yet, there is a powerful and instructive legacy of theorisation and practice that suggests other possibilities towards the development of a progressive, even radical, agenda for workers’ education and its associated forms. These possibilities have been abandoned by the prevailing regime of policy and practice, which could have drawn on the work of trade unions, progressive social movements and organisations, including some of their negative practices. We consider these historical possibilities briefly with a view to opening up a discussion about the possibilities they represent for educational theory and practice.
Reference64 articles.
1. Aitchison, J. J. W. 2003. “Struggle and Compromise: A History of South African Adult Education from 1960 to 2001”. Journal of Education 29: 125–78.
2. Alexander, N. 2002. An Ordinary Country: Issues in the Transition from Apartheid to Democracy in South Africa. Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal Press.
3. Allais, S. 2021. “Crediting Worker Education? Insights from South African Experiences”. Social Dynamics: A Journal of African Studies 47 (3): 550–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533952.2021.1999113.
4. Baatjes, B. 2020. Beware of the Bot: A Critical Perspective on the 4IR. Gqeberha: CIPSET, Nelson Mandela University.
5. Baatjes, I., ed. 2018. Learning for Living: Towards a New Vision for Post-School Learning in South Africa. Pretoria: HSRC Press.