Abstract
The article outlines the phenomenon of direct reported speech in the Hebrew Bible and presents some of the guiding principles for the recently undertaken revision of the speech level markup in the Andersen-Forbes Morphology and Syntax Database. For the revised version of the markup, a higher number of unusual forms of direct speech has been included, such as implied direct speech and direct speech introduced by quotative frames without verbs of speech. The article argues that a simplified markup strategy is often both methodologically and theoretically appropriate for texts that are vague, ambiguous, and/or generally underspecified with respect to direct speech. The simplified markup strategy means that when there is uncertainty as to whether a given point of transition in the text marks either the beginning or the end of a unit of reported speech, one should assume that the current state of affairs continues.
Reference14 articles.
1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2008. “Semi-direct Speech: Manambu and Beyond.” Language Sciences 30 (4): 383–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.07.009
2. Boeder, Winfried. 2002. “Speech and Thought Representation in the Kartvelian (South Caucasian) Languages.” In Reported Discourse: A Meeting Ground for Different Linguistic Domains, edited by Tom Güldeman and Manfred von Roncador, 3–48. Typological Studies in Language 52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Ebook Central. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.52.04boe
3. Evans, Nicolas. 2012. “Some Problems in the Typology of Quotation: A Canonical Approach.” In Canonical Morphology and Syntax, edited by Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina, and Greville G. Corbett, 66–98. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604326.003.0004
4. Green, Lisa J. 2007. “Syntactic Variation.” In Sociolinguistic Variation: Theories, Methods, and Applications, edited by Robert Bayley and Ceil Lucas, 24–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Accessed March 31, 2021. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/linguist_faculty_pubs/184
5. Hildebrandt, Samuel. 2020. “Whose Voice Is Heard? Speaker Ambiguity in the Psalms.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 82 (2): 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1353/cbq.2020.0082